What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Optimize for size and weight at expense of optical performance?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="henry link" data-source="post: 3370455" data-attributes="member: 6806"><p>It should be noted that the Leica Ultravid optical designs were not originally conceived to be housed in small light bodies. The basic designs are little changed from the optics of the robust and heavy Trinovid BAs from 25 years ago. Eye relief and FOV are unchanged and even the physical lengths of the bodies are still about the same for the current Ultravids as they were for the first Trinovid BAs. The original Trinovid BA designers were clearly not much concerned with making optical compromises for the sake of reducing weight and size. The BAs weighed about 50% more than the Leitz Trinovid models they replaced.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="henry link, post: 3370455, member: 6806"] It should be noted that the Leica Ultravid optical designs were not originally conceived to be housed in small light bodies. The basic designs are little changed from the optics of the robust and heavy Trinovid BAs from 25 years ago. Eye relief and FOV are unchanged and even the physical lengths of the bodies are still about the same for the current Ultravids as they were for the first Trinovid BAs. The original Trinovid BA designers were clearly not much concerned with making optical compromises for the sake of reducing weight and size. The BAs weighed about 50% more than the Leitz Trinovid models they replaced. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Optimize for size and weight at expense of optical performance?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top