What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Optimize for size and weight at expense of optical performance?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ceasar" data-source="post: 3370518" data-attributes="member: 26155"><p>Henry,</p><p></p><p>Perhaps a lot has to do with the two Leica's I own. Using the Leica 7x42 Trinovid BN still does make a difference to me when compared to my 8x42 Ultravid Blackline. I don't know how much the weight difference is but I can feel a difference when I carry them around. </p><p></p><p>As a comparison I usually keep my Leica 7x42 Trinovid BN in the little zip leather pouch that came with it. But there is a lot more room leftover inside when I carry my 8x42 Ultravid Blackline it. As you know it has a hard leather exterior.</p><p></p><p>They are the same length as the 7x42 Trinovid BN and quite a bit thinner when fully closed. The weight difference between them is readily noticeable. </p><p></p><p>For the record, from the technical data in their manual, they are also 80 grams (nearly 3 ounces) lighter and 4mm shorter and have 1mm less depth than the standard 8x42 Ultravid HD. (It may be about as small as it can be and still keep the same optics.)</p><p></p><p>Bob</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ceasar, post: 3370518, member: 26155"] Henry, Perhaps a lot has to do with the two Leica's I own. Using the Leica 7x42 Trinovid BN still does make a difference to me when compared to my 8x42 Ultravid Blackline. I don't know how much the weight difference is but I can feel a difference when I carry them around. As a comparison I usually keep my Leica 7x42 Trinovid BN in the little zip leather pouch that came with it. But there is a lot more room leftover inside when I carry my 8x42 Ultravid Blackline it. As you know it has a hard leather exterior. They are the same length as the 7x42 Trinovid BN and quite a bit thinner when fully closed. The weight difference between them is readily noticeable. For the record, from the technical data in their manual, they are also 80 grams (nearly 3 ounces) lighter and 4mm shorter and have 1mm less depth than the standard 8x42 Ultravid HD. (It may be about as small as it can be and still keep the same optics.) Bob [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Optimize for size and weight at expense of optical performance?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top