What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Optimize for size and weight at expense of optical performance?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hermann" data-source="post: 3370564" data-attributes="member: 4925"><p>Definitely, although I still haven't got the 8x32 HD Plus. After all, I've still got my 8x32 BA dating back to 1993 ... <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /> And after >20 years of hard use my 8x32 BA is still in perfect shape. Quite amazing, really.</p><p></p><p>The decision will depend to some extent on how good the 8x32 HD Plus really is, especially if it's really clearly better than the Ultravid HD. The 42mm Ultravid HD Plus are quite a bit better, I think. Not sure about the 8x32 though. The difference seems me to be smaller, but I need some time in the field to make up my mind.</p><p></p><p>Hermann</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hermann, post: 3370564, member: 4925"] Definitely, although I still haven't got the 8x32 HD Plus. After all, I've still got my 8x32 BA dating back to 1993 ... ;) And after >20 years of hard use my 8x32 BA is still in perfect shape. Quite amazing, really. The decision will depend to some extent on how good the 8x32 HD Plus really is, especially if it's really clearly better than the Ultravid HD. The 42mm Ultravid HD Plus are quite a bit better, I think. Not sure about the 8x32 though. The difference seems me to be smaller, but I need some time in the field to make up my mind. Hermann [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Optimize for size and weight at expense of optical performance?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top