What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Optimize for size and weight at expense of optical performance?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OPTIC_NUT" data-source="post: 3371635" data-attributes="member: 121951"><p>If I could only boil down the "can't ever calculate dof because """afocal!!""".... rebuttal.</p><p></p><p>Try this:</p><p>----joe has his vision correction on</p><p>----he focuses on something 200 yds away (practically infinity)...say, with a 7x35</p><p>----he (like me) then checks out posters with different size fonts</p><p> at 50ft, 75ft, 100ft, and 150ft</p><p> Scaling fonts for distances, he sees that the font that's supposed to see sharply at 100ft</p><p> is just starting to blur. At 75ft, he can barely read "the quick brown fox" </p><p></p><p>What can we say?</p><p></p><p>1) In focusing sharply at 100 yds, he has not only formed a sharp image on his retina,</p><p>2) He has created a sharp virtual image that exists regardles of whose corrected eyes look through.</p><p> (assuming he uses the sound practice of doing a 'longside-in' focus to reduce eyestrain)</p><p></p><p>It is easy for Joe to see the de-focusing to a certain font at a certain range.</p><p>It is simple to calculate at least a 2-lens approximation of when a point in the image</p><p> becomes a disk of a certain radial size in the virtual image.</p><p></p><p>The way Joe is using the binoculars, they are quite focal in his eyes and at the virtual image plane.</p><p>It's only 'afocal' if he keeps diddling the knob or his eye strains in the middle of its adjustment range.</p><p></p><p>Sharp focus is what he paid for, what he focused for, and what he got. Picking the relaxed-eye case </p><p>reduces the system to a clearly focal instance. If it didn't, Joe would demand a refund.</p><p></p><p>It doesn't matter what you call the system. It must necessarily come to a sharp focus as a virtual image</p><p>in this case, and that can be calculated as to when a point on it will become a disk of a size you find</p><p>too blurred (as you move in to closer targets without re-focusing). </p><p> Joe can clearly see a red herring, but because he uses binoculars, the smell is not too bad.</p><p>He knows things are clear.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OPTIC_NUT, post: 3371635, member: 121951"] If I could only boil down the "can't ever calculate dof because """afocal!!""".... rebuttal. Try this: ----joe has his vision correction on ----he focuses on something 200 yds away (practically infinity)...say, with a 7x35 ----he (like me) then checks out posters with different size fonts at 50ft, 75ft, 100ft, and 150ft Scaling fonts for distances, he sees that the font that's supposed to see sharply at 100ft is just starting to blur. At 75ft, he can barely read "the quick brown fox" What can we say? 1) In focusing sharply at 100 yds, he has not only formed a sharp image on his retina, 2) He has created a sharp virtual image that exists regardles of whose corrected eyes look through. (assuming he uses the sound practice of doing a 'longside-in' focus to reduce eyestrain) It is easy for Joe to see the de-focusing to a certain font at a certain range. It is simple to calculate at least a 2-lens approximation of when a point in the image becomes a disk of a certain radial size in the virtual image. The way Joe is using the binoculars, they are quite focal in his eyes and at the virtual image plane. It's only 'afocal' if he keeps diddling the knob or his eye strains in the middle of its adjustment range. Sharp focus is what he paid for, what he focused for, and what he got. Picking the relaxed-eye case reduces the system to a clearly focal instance. If it didn't, Joe would demand a refund. It doesn't matter what you call the system. It must necessarily come to a sharp focus as a virtual image in this case, and that can be calculated as to when a point on it will become a disk of a size you find too blurred (as you move in to closer targets without re-focusing). Joe can clearly see a red herring, but because he uses binoculars, the smell is not too bad. He knows things are clear. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Optimize for size and weight at expense of optical performance?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top