What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Optimize for size and weight at expense of optical performance?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Steve C" data-source="post: 3376487" data-attributes="member: 56622"><p>I agree with Lee here. I have been saying for some time that ergonomics and handling are paramount in a users satisfaction with their binocular. From my personal standpoint, there is adequate optical quality available starting with the ZEN Prime HD at about $750 (as an example). It may well be taken to the $500 level with a number of excellent binoculars as well. When you hit this optical quality level, I think the user is a lot better off with a well balanced, easy to handle binocular that has eye cups that fit the users eyes, and eye cup extension that matches the users needs. The binocular has to be looked at as a holistic system that can operate symbiotically with the user.</p><p></p><p>Ultimately the user needs to be able to shut off the little voices in their heads telling them there is something better and they need to upgrade. A balanced system of the optics and mechanics of the binocular and the optical system of the user trumps a lot. So we balance size and weight against optics. We also have a lot of other things that need to find a balance too. Just because it has decent size and weight for a particular users needs, it does not mean other ergonomics issues will not eliminate its use .</p><p></p><p>Shutting off the little voices is largely where the personal preferences come to play. Some can shut off those little voices far more easily than others. A ZEN Prime HD or maybe a Vanguard Endeavor ED may do the trick. Others value the subconscious knowledge of the superiority of their expensive alpha glass. Those personal preferences are where the optics discussion that drive this place originate. Where we each find a level of binocular where our subconscious will shut up and leave us alone to use the binocular is where we will find satisfaction. I always say a binocular is a lot like any one of your friends. They aren't your friends because they are perfect. Your binocular is not perfect either.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Steve C, post: 3376487, member: 56622"] I agree with Lee here. I have been saying for some time that ergonomics and handling are paramount in a users satisfaction with their binocular. From my personal standpoint, there is adequate optical quality available starting with the ZEN Prime HD at about $750 (as an example). It may well be taken to the $500 level with a number of excellent binoculars as well. When you hit this optical quality level, I think the user is a lot better off with a well balanced, easy to handle binocular that has eye cups that fit the users eyes, and eye cup extension that matches the users needs. The binocular has to be looked at as a holistic system that can operate symbiotically with the user. Ultimately the user needs to be able to shut off the little voices in their heads telling them there is something better and they need to upgrade. A balanced system of the optics and mechanics of the binocular and the optical system of the user trumps a lot. So we balance size and weight against optics. We also have a lot of other things that need to find a balance too. Just because it has decent size and weight for a particular users needs, it does not mean other ergonomics issues will not eliminate its use . Shutting off the little voices is largely where the personal preferences come to play. Some can shut off those little voices far more easily than others. A ZEN Prime HD or maybe a Vanguard Endeavor ED may do the trick. Others value the subconscious knowledge of the superiority of their expensive alpha glass. Those personal preferences are where the optics discussion that drive this place originate. Where we each find a level of binocular where our subconscious will shut up and leave us alone to use the binocular is where we will find satisfaction. I always say a binocular is a lot like any one of your friends. They aren't your friends because they are perfect. Your binocular is not perfect either. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Optimize for size and weight at expense of optical performance?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top