What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Overall Best Binoculars
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Fireform" data-source="post: 1428753" data-attributes="member: 65457"><p>I've often wondered the same thing caesar. An ED version of the SE with twist up eyecups would be amazing. </p><p></p><p>FWIW, fluorite is far too soft and easily scratched to be a practical objective material in a birding binocular.</p><p></p><p>I have to say, I think there may be a certain amount of kool-aid being drunk by the chinese ED binocular fandom (or "irrational exuberance" in another memorable phrase). They ARE very good binoculars, especially for the money. I had an evening with the Zens, and that pair was very sharp and well corrected, on a par with the Leupold golden ring HDs (and that's saying something). They aren't as bright as the dielectric coated bins I've looked through, or my a-k prism Zeisses. They are way heavier than the 8x32 SEs and if they have a brightness advantage in that comparison I couldn't see it. Although the accessories are almost junk, the bins themselves feel very good in the hand. </p><p></p><p>I am also among the luddite faction that harbors serious unease about supporting chinese industry with my dollars when other good options are available. Will they support your bins in 5 or 10 years? What are the labor standards in these plants? Is their manufacture government-subsidized to undercut non-chinese brands in the market? Questions like these don't necessarily affect my view of a bird, but they weigh on my mind later. The counter-argument that capitalism is transforming chinese society and that we support that transformation by buying quality chinese goods is perfectly valid. Everyone has their own comfort zone.</p><p></p><p>Different strokes for different folks. I've decided I'd rather have $1400 in one superb glass that I use all the time than to have it spread over 4, 5 or 6 glasses, only one of which I will use at a time and none of which will give me an alpha view. "Saving money" on a slew of midrange glass is an experiment I've given up on.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Fireform, post: 1428753, member: 65457"] I've often wondered the same thing caesar. An ED version of the SE with twist up eyecups would be amazing. FWIW, fluorite is far too soft and easily scratched to be a practical objective material in a birding binocular. I have to say, I think there may be a certain amount of kool-aid being drunk by the chinese ED binocular fandom (or "irrational exuberance" in another memorable phrase). They ARE very good binoculars, especially for the money. I had an evening with the Zens, and that pair was very sharp and well corrected, on a par with the Leupold golden ring HDs (and that's saying something). They aren't as bright as the dielectric coated bins I've looked through, or my a-k prism Zeisses. They are way heavier than the 8x32 SEs and if they have a brightness advantage in that comparison I couldn't see it. Although the accessories are almost junk, the bins themselves feel very good in the hand. I am also among the luddite faction that harbors serious unease about supporting chinese industry with my dollars when other good options are available. Will they support your bins in 5 or 10 years? What are the labor standards in these plants? Is their manufacture government-subsidized to undercut non-chinese brands in the market? Questions like these don't necessarily affect my view of a bird, but they weigh on my mind later. The counter-argument that capitalism is transforming chinese society and that we support that transformation by buying quality chinese goods is perfectly valid. Everyone has their own comfort zone. Different strokes for different folks. I've decided I'd rather have $1400 in one superb glass that I use all the time than to have it spread over 4, 5 or 6 glasses, only one of which I will use at a time and none of which will give me an alpha view. "Saving money" on a slew of midrange glass is an experiment I've given up on. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Overall Best Binoculars
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top