What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Leica
Owners: How Are Your Leica Noctivids Serving You?!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mike F" data-source="post: 3585734" data-attributes="member: 142462"><p>Until I came on this forum I'd never even thought about the way that I look through binoculars. Personally I find that I do move my eyes around the FOV (which as has been said is surely the norm) but I would say not usually beyond the central 60-70%. If, as an exercise, I look to the periphery of the image I am most definitely moving my eyes much more up and down or from side to side than I do when not using bins. In fact I find it quite unnatural and even somewhat uncomfortable to do so. AFAIK I have perfectly normal vision(!) so there's no physical reason why my eye movement would be restricted in any way - I just don't like doing it. </p><p></p><p>Comparing the UVHD+ and NV with regard to image sharpness at the extremities, I would say that roughly speaking the UVHD+ is sharp in the central 80% and the NV sharp central 90% (in other words to within 10% and 5% of the edge respectively) of the FOV. So for me, in practice, I notice no difference in this respect between them because I simply don't look there. Doing so would be akin to moving my eyes as far left and right or up and down as I can in normal vision without bins, and I never do that.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mike F, post: 3585734, member: 142462"] Until I came on this forum I'd never even thought about the way that I look through binoculars. Personally I find that I do move my eyes around the FOV (which as has been said is surely the norm) but I would say not usually beyond the central 60-70%. If, as an exercise, I look to the periphery of the image I am most definitely moving my eyes much more up and down or from side to side than I do when not using bins. In fact I find it quite unnatural and even somewhat uncomfortable to do so. AFAIK I have perfectly normal vision(!) so there's no physical reason why my eye movement would be restricted in any way - I just don't like doing it. Comparing the UVHD+ and NV with regard to image sharpness at the extremities, I would say that roughly speaking the UVHD+ is sharp in the central 80% and the NV sharp central 90% (in other words to within 10% and 5% of the edge respectively) of the FOV. So for me, in practice, I notice no difference in this respect between them because I simply don't look there. Doing so would be akin to moving my eyes as far left and right or up and down as I can in normal vision without bins, and I never do that. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Leica
Owners: How Are Your Leica Noctivids Serving You?!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top