What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Leica
Owners: How Are Your Leica Noctivids Serving You?!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rathaus" data-source="post: 3586759" data-attributes="member: 132018"><p>This is why I described the phenomenon as 'image manipulation', and the outcome as 'image aesthetic'. Swarovski, through skilful design intent and application, have offered us their interpretation of a 'flatter field'. Leica, through skilful design intent and application, has chosen a somewhat different path. </p><p></p><p>Henry, regarding this topic, you will note that neither Swarovski nor Leica use hard scientific data to either prove their case, denounce their competitors, nor to convince us into purchasing their product. That is because, regarding an image as witnessed through binoculars - there is no applicable hard scientific data to neatly plot, measure and explain away a 'flat field' or 'field curvature'. When anybody speaks of these phenomena in relation to an image viewed through binoculars, they themselves (yourself included) have entered the shifting sands of the descriptive and subjective world. I see nothing wrong with that, but let it be known for what it is.</p><p></p><p>Rathaus</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rathaus, post: 3586759, member: 132018"] This is why I described the phenomenon as 'image manipulation', and the outcome as 'image aesthetic'. Swarovski, through skilful design intent and application, have offered us their interpretation of a 'flatter field'. Leica, through skilful design intent and application, has chosen a somewhat different path. Henry, regarding this topic, you will note that neither Swarovski nor Leica use hard scientific data to either prove their case, denounce their competitors, nor to convince us into purchasing their product. That is because, regarding an image as witnessed through binoculars - there is no applicable hard scientific data to neatly plot, measure and explain away a 'flat field' or 'field curvature'. When anybody speaks of these phenomena in relation to an image viewed through binoculars, they themselves (yourself included) have entered the shifting sands of the descriptive and subjective world. I see nothing wrong with that, but let it be known for what it is. Rathaus [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Leica
Owners: How Are Your Leica Noctivids Serving You?!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top