What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Par 2: Maven and Swarovski
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Steve C" data-source="post: 3279810" data-attributes="member: 56622"><p>Ted,</p><p></p><p>Yeah, the 10x 345' vs the 9x 385' the SV actually does seem wider. This is a first glance thing and maybe nobody but me will see it the same way, but yes the SV looks to have a slightly wider fov. Remember the afov is essentially the same. SO I think it has to be edge differences at work.</p><p></p><p>I guess it depends on your eyes. I will just say it is noticeable, but not much. Also comparing depth of field difference sin favor of the 9x vs the 10x just clouds the issue. I'd say the effect is there, but not dramatic.</p><p></p><p>One of the thing I kept hearing over and over was that your eyes will get used to rolling ball. I had the thing for over two weeks before it showed up and got progressively worse. Each session was worse than the one before.</p><p></p><p>If you are looking for optical improvements in the SV EL with the Maven, forget it. I did not want to leave that impression. If you think the SV EL will blow out the Maven B2, forget it. There are differences more so than improvements.</p><p></p><p>As for the wow factor, it has to go to the B2. Not because it is "best" but because of what you get for the $1,000.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Steve C, post: 3279810, member: 56622"] Ted, Yeah, the 10x 345' vs the 9x 385' the SV actually does seem wider. This is a first glance thing and maybe nobody but me will see it the same way, but yes the SV looks to have a slightly wider fov. Remember the afov is essentially the same. SO I think it has to be edge differences at work. I guess it depends on your eyes. I will just say it is noticeable, but not much. Also comparing depth of field difference sin favor of the 9x vs the 10x just clouds the issue. I'd say the effect is there, but not dramatic. One of the thing I kept hearing over and over was that your eyes will get used to rolling ball. I had the thing for over two weeks before it showed up and got progressively worse. Each session was worse than the one before. If you are looking for optical improvements in the SV EL with the Maven, forget it. I did not want to leave that impression. If you think the SV EL will blow out the Maven B2, forget it. There are differences more so than improvements. As for the wow factor, it has to go to the B2. Not because it is "best" but because of what you get for the $1,000. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Par 2: Maven and Swarovski
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top