What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Par 2: Maven and Swarovski
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="brocknroller" data-source="post: 3280175" data-attributes="member: 665"><p>Originally Posted by brocknroller View Post</p><p>I agree with all Ted said about Steve's review. .................................................. ................................................</p><p></p><p>Brock</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Okay, I got it now, as long as I <em>agree</em> with you, you're fine with it, but not if I disagree with you, for example, about you saying that all users who experience problems with Swaro focusers are OCD. <em>Who</em> is being "flat out insulting?" And you made some personal attacks on me, too, do I need to dig those out? An aphorism comes to mind: People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.</p><p></p><p>But what ticked me off was not what you said about me but your sweeping condemnation of all those who don't experience things as you do. You experienced RB, so that's now fine, but you don't experience problems with Swaro focusers, so everybody who does (and there are <em>many</em>) should be get a DSM 300.3 label. </p><p></p><p>That provincial attitude is what defines The Defenders. Doesn't matter what it is, RB, wonky focusers, loose armoring, etc. If they haven't experienced it with their Swaros, then they are the end all authority by which all others' opinions are harshly judged. If I were King of the Forest, I would delete all such narrow minded posts, but since I'm not, I try to ignore them, though it's difficult when people reply with the posts quoted.</p><p></p><p>From my POV, you're the one who crossed over the line from being a member who gives "fair and balanced" reviews of binoculars (except the ones you don't like, which you don't review but send back with a "Thank you" note) to one who is intolerant of other peoples' opinions. That was uncharacteristic and disappointing. </p><p></p><p>However, I will have to forgive and forget because if I put on you on my Ignore List with The Defenders, I will miss your excellent reviews. But seriously, try those crow recipes, I hear it tastes like chicken. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>Brock</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="brocknroller, post: 3280175, member: 665"] Originally Posted by brocknroller View Post I agree with all Ted said about Steve's review. .................................................. ................................................ Brock Okay, I got it now, as long as I [I]agree[/I] with you, you're fine with it, but not if I disagree with you, for example, about you saying that all users who experience problems with Swaro focusers are OCD. [I]Who[/I] is being "flat out insulting?" And you made some personal attacks on me, too, do I need to dig those out? An aphorism comes to mind: People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. But what ticked me off was not what you said about me but your sweeping condemnation of all those who don't experience things as you do. You experienced RB, so that's now fine, but you don't experience problems with Swaro focusers, so everybody who does (and there are [I]many[/I]) should be get a DSM 300.3 label. That provincial attitude is what defines The Defenders. Doesn't matter what it is, RB, wonky focusers, loose armoring, etc. If they haven't experienced it with their Swaros, then they are the end all authority by which all others' opinions are harshly judged. If I were King of the Forest, I would delete all such narrow minded posts, but since I'm not, I try to ignore them, though it's difficult when people reply with the posts quoted. From my POV, you're the one who crossed over the line from being a member who gives "fair and balanced" reviews of binoculars (except the ones you don't like, which you don't review but send back with a "Thank you" note) to one who is intolerant of other peoples' opinions. That was uncharacteristic and disappointing. However, I will have to forgive and forget because if I put on you on my Ignore List with The Defenders, I will miss your excellent reviews. But seriously, try those crow recipes, I hear it tastes like chicken. ;) Brock [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Par 2: Maven and Swarovski
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top