What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
"Phase Compensation of Internal Reflection" by Paul Mauer, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 56, 1219
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Leif" data-source="post: 1306483" data-attributes="member: 1250"><p>I have no idea if the roof prism does or does not introduce any noticeable image degradation when well made and coated. But I recall someone stating that roof prism bins tend to have faster objectives - i.e. shorter focal lengths - which will introduce aberrations. In addition faster objectives will require more sophisticated eyepieces, which will increase cost, and perhaps extra aberrations from the eyepieces. In addition most roof prism bins focus by means of a sliding lens between the objective and the prism. My suspicion is that the focus lens is a major cause of CA in many roof prism bins, especially cheap ones. To my eye roof prism bins which focus by moving the objective tend to have noticeably better image quality than others. </p><p></p><p>Anyway, I doubt that major manufacturers will introduce top grade porro bins, sadly. Fashion, weight and bulk surely mitigate against them.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Leif, post: 1306483, member: 1250"] I have no idea if the roof prism does or does not introduce any noticeable image degradation when well made and coated. But I recall someone stating that roof prism bins tend to have faster objectives - i.e. shorter focal lengths - which will introduce aberrations. In addition faster objectives will require more sophisticated eyepieces, which will increase cost, and perhaps extra aberrations from the eyepieces. In addition most roof prism bins focus by means of a sliding lens between the objective and the prism. My suspicion is that the focus lens is a major cause of CA in many roof prism bins, especially cheap ones. To my eye roof prism bins which focus by moving the objective tend to have noticeably better image quality than others. Anyway, I doubt that major manufacturers will introduce top grade porro bins, sadly. Fashion, weight and bulk surely mitigate against them. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
"Phase Compensation of Internal Reflection" by Paul Mauer, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 56, 1219
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top