What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
"Phase Compensation of Internal Reflection" by Paul Mauer, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 56, 1219
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="kabsetz" data-source="post: 1346841" data-attributes="member: 10167"><p>Jean-Charles,</p><p></p><p>Good to have you posting again.</p><p></p><p>I am one of the few who, like you use "star-testing" (examining points of light with additional magnification) routinely. Doing this soon shows one that aberrations vary a lot, usually even between the two barrels of one and the same binocular. Perhaps people do not perform this test because they are daunted by the idea that one should be able to interpret it accurately enough to assign a numerical value to their finding for it to be meaningful. Although this could be done, to some extent, with a lot of experience and very careful scrutiny, for useful practical-purpose results it is not necessary. At the simplest level, one can even get some very good information by casually examining a defocused glitter point with a hand-held binocular and no booster.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="kabsetz, post: 1346841, member: 10167"] Jean-Charles, Good to have you posting again. I am one of the few who, like you use "star-testing" (examining points of light with additional magnification) routinely. Doing this soon shows one that aberrations vary a lot, usually even between the two barrels of one and the same binocular. Perhaps people do not perform this test because they are daunted by the idea that one should be able to interpret it accurately enough to assign a numerical value to their finding for it to be meaningful. Although this could be done, to some extent, with a lot of experience and very careful scrutiny, for useful practical-purpose results it is not necessary. At the simplest level, one can even get some very good information by casually examining a defocused glitter point with a hand-held binocular and no booster. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
"Phase Compensation of Internal Reflection" by Paul Mauer, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 56, 1219
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top