So not as subspecies?
Niels
So not as subspecies?Niels
Therefore, Lima et al. (2020) propose that P. limae and P. fulvescens comprise a single species with a high degree of color variation and a clinal distribution.
I'd assume they print out a few copies of their pdfs and mail them out to major libraries to satisfy the Code. Presumably if they didn't, the libraries could do so off their own bat?Is someone able to confirm that the Russian Ornithological Journal publishes a printed version? If it is published online only, the new taxa described are not validly introduced, as they need a ZooBank registration.
I'd not read the Code as being easily satisfied with a few printed copies mailed out to major libraries.I'd assume they print out a few copies of their pdfs and mail them out to major libraries to satisfy the Code. Presumably if they didn't, the libraries could do so off their own bat?
Further studies are nevertheless needed in the Balkans, where leucotos and lilfordi came recently into contact to measure the effectiveness of reproductive barriers and gene flow.
Not sure that the Japanese pops are raised to species rank. Only the lilfordi and insularis clades should be elevatedSo if the Japanese populations were split, what would be the new species name? The oldest described two described subspecies for Japan were both described by Stejneger in 1866 (D.l. subcirris and D.l. namiyei) according to Wikipedia.