What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Bird Identification Q&A
Pine Bunting, Shropshire England ?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MTem" data-source="post: 3510227" data-attributes="member: 107707"><p>I too am finding this increasingly bizarre - but for a different reason. As I commented on another thread recently, although I have been birding for about 50 years - from the age of 10 or so - with variable intensity of course, and have hence lived through the pre-digital (and for most the pre-camera) age I do now carry a DSLR camera habitually - and bins - and a scope. I have great eyesight for a ROF, but now find it harder to capture small features convincingly in a small, fast-moving and/or flying bird. It seems my mind's 'shutter-speed' maximum is reducing with age. Also whereas for a lot of my earlier years I just didn't bother with some complex species groups or subspecies (gulls especially) as my allowable birding time was 'domestically-limited'.</p><p></p><p>Now however I have all the time in the world, and also the necessary financial resources to buy all the necessary cr@p - so a perfect day out in the field for me now also includes trying to get good enough photos to allow me to study some of the more detailed features in the comfort and warmth of my house. If I had just got into birding I have no doubt a camera would be as vital as bins and a scope, and I would carry all three on all but the most casual of outings.</p><p></p><p>Some do it seems try to substitute personal effort with a few images, but most supplement - me as well - and I think this supplementation is progress not regression.</p><p></p><p>.... for as long as I am fit enough to carry it all anyway!</p><p></p><p>Also - even back in the day some of the field notes and sketches I saw would not differentiate a Blackbird from a Common scoter. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>Mick</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MTem, post: 3510227, member: 107707"] I too am finding this increasingly bizarre - but for a different reason. As I commented on another thread recently, although I have been birding for about 50 years - from the age of 10 or so - with variable intensity of course, and have hence lived through the pre-digital (and for most the pre-camera) age I do now carry a DSLR camera habitually - and bins - and a scope. I have great eyesight for a ROF, but now find it harder to capture small features convincingly in a small, fast-moving and/or flying bird. It seems my mind's 'shutter-speed' maximum is reducing with age. Also whereas for a lot of my earlier years I just didn't bother with some complex species groups or subspecies (gulls especially) as my allowable birding time was 'domestically-limited'. Now however I have all the time in the world, and also the necessary financial resources to buy all the necessary cr@p - so a perfect day out in the field for me now also includes trying to get good enough photos to allow me to study some of the more detailed features in the comfort and warmth of my house. If I had just got into birding I have no doubt a camera would be as vital as bins and a scope, and I would carry all three on all but the most casual of outings. Some do it seems try to substitute personal effort with a few images, but most supplement - me as well - and I think this supplementation is progress not regression. .... for as long as I am fit enough to carry it all anyway! Also - even back in the day some of the field notes and sketches I saw would not differentiate a Blackbird from a Common scoter. ;) Mick [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Bird Identification Q&A
Pine Bunting, Shropshire England ?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top