What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Bird Identification Q&A
please id this bird...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bitterntwisted" data-source="post: 1364872" data-attributes="member: 46297"><p>That kind of attitude would be ridiculous if you were right. It's even more laughable when you're wrong, as you seem to be. I was going to wait until I got back home and had both Shorebirds and BWPi in front of me before composing a detailed reply, but this is just silly. Greenshanks do not have red legs. Redshanks often show very limited red at the base of the bill, as illustrated in the link already provided. </p><p> </p><p>I think the bird in front can be conclusively identified (contrary to your position) as a Wood Sandpiper. As well as the obvious super and plumage tones, and the slender structure, I seem to remember that the marked undertail coverts may be the clincher, with Green Sandpiper being diagnostically unmarked, but I could very well be wrong about that. In fact, I could very well be wrong about many things, which is a healthy outlook I suggest you consider employing.</p><p> </p><p>Graham</p><p> </p><p>PS - I think you meant Jade Goody and Stephen Hawking.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bitterntwisted, post: 1364872, member: 46297"] That kind of attitude would be ridiculous if you were right. It's even more laughable when you're wrong, as you seem to be. I was going to wait until I got back home and had both Shorebirds and BWPi in front of me before composing a detailed reply, but this is just silly. Greenshanks do not have red legs. Redshanks often show very limited red at the base of the bill, as illustrated in the link already provided. I think the bird in front can be conclusively identified (contrary to your position) as a Wood Sandpiper. As well as the obvious super and plumage tones, and the slender structure, I seem to remember that the marked undertail coverts may be the clincher, with Green Sandpiper being diagnostically unmarked, but I could very well be wrong about that. In fact, I could very well be wrong about many things, which is a healthy outlook I suggest you consider employing. Graham PS - I think you meant Jade Goody and Stephen Hawking. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Bird Identification Q&A
please id this bird...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top