What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Bird Identification Q&A
Please identify? Urgent. US Florida
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jos Stratford" data-source="post: 1697618" data-attributes="member: 12449"><p>I fail to see anywhere in that mighty list a prohibition to protect a bird in a state of torpor on the ground from an imminent threat of consumption by six or seven cats known to be in the area.</p><p></p><p>This Act was created to aid protection of wild birds, the original poster clearly acted in interests to protect the bird too. Taking such an attitude against her actions is not only petty-minded, but also absolutely not in the birds interest. Also, if this is the first response they get when helping birds, it is also likely to sour interest in birds amongst 'normal' persons.</p><p></p><p>Incidently, further, as you are so caught up in this act, you also told the poster to get the birds to a rehabber, thus not only increasing the level of stress to the individual birds, but also exposing them to the hand of man, which also seems to be your concern. Surely a better thing to do is exactly as she did, keep them overnight, preferably in a quiet, dark box, them release them overnight.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jos Stratford, post: 1697618, member: 12449"] I fail to see anywhere in that mighty list a prohibition to protect a bird in a state of torpor on the ground from an imminent threat of consumption by six or seven cats known to be in the area. This Act was created to aid protection of wild birds, the original poster clearly acted in interests to protect the bird too. Taking such an attitude against her actions is not only petty-minded, but also absolutely not in the birds interest. Also, if this is the first response they get when helping birds, it is also likely to sour interest in birds amongst 'normal' persons. Incidently, further, as you are so caught up in this act, you also told the poster to get the birds to a rehabber, thus not only increasing the level of stress to the individual birds, but also exposing them to the hand of man, which also seems to be your concern. Surely a better thing to do is exactly as she did, keep them overnight, preferably in a quiet, dark box, them release them overnight. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Bird Identification Q&A
Please identify? Urgent. US Florida
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top