BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE!

Register for an account to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Jim M." data-source="post: 1698299" data-attributes="member: 60675">This is an issue that comes up frequently on this forum, and it is unfortunate that some posters are resorting to personal attacks and name-calling rather than intelligent argument.  I'm not saying I completely agree with his posts, but Humminbird's advice is pretty much the standard advice that government agencies give.  Here is a link with some good info from a government web site: <a href="http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/about/faqs/birds/feathers.htm" target="_blank">http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/about/faqs/birds/feathers.htm</a>I copy some of it below: A type of question that we commonly get involves well meaning people who want to rescue young or injured birds, secure feathers for artwork, or salvage eggs or nests for various purposes.     Anyone desiring to possess migratory birds or their parts or products should be aware that all of these are covered under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16U.S.C. 703-712), which implements a series of international treaties designed to protect migratory birds.     Some key provisions of the Act are worth keeping in mind: <ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Wording of the Act makes it very clear that most actions that result in "taking" or possession of a protected species or its parts or products is a violation of the Act. Specifically, the Act states: "Unless and except as permitted by regulations, …it shall be unlawful at any time, by any means, or in any manner…to pursue, hunt, take, capture, kill, …possess, offer for sale, sell, …purchase, import…any migratory bird, any part, nest, or eggs of any such bird…" </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">It is a "strict-liability" law, meaning that there is no requirement for law enforcement agencies to prove "intent" to violate the law. That is, if you are found in possession of a protected species or its parts or products, you are automatically in violation of the law.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The provisions of the Act are nearly absolute; "...except as permitted by regulations ..." is the only exception. Some examples of permitted activities that do not violate the law are legal hunting of specific game birds, legitimate research activities, display in licensed zoological gardens, and bird banding under an appropriate permit.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The Act covers the great majority (83%) of all native birds found in the U.S. Many of the species not covered by the Act are covered by the Endangered Species Act , other Federal laws, or state laws, many of which are as stringent as the Migratory Bird Treaty Act . In the lower 48 states, all species except the house sparrow, feral pigeon, common starling, and non-migratory game birds like pheasants, gray partridge, and sage grouse, are protected.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Penalties upon conviction can be severe. Even if a sympathetic jury finds that you meant no harm in trying to rear an abandoned nestling or in picking a hawk feather, legal defense costs are clearly not worth the risk.</li> </ul> In summary: your best approach is to take a hands off approach...look but don't collect. If you find an injured bird or abandoned nestling, call the local game warden before you pick it up.  (If this seems cruel, take a minute and read the FAQ entitled "<a href="http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/about/faqs/birds/nestling.htm" target="_blank">How do I care for an abandoned nestling?</a>") One reason I believe the law is so strict is because if it allowed exceptions for those with good intentions anyone discovered in possession of a bird could simply claim he took it in temporarily and was planning to release it--thus making the act almost impossible to enforce.Best,Jim</blockquote>

Verification