What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Polyborus vs. Caracara
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mb1848" data-source="post: 1672769" data-attributes="member: 31036"><p>Rainier, thank you for all the information. This is a complex case. If it is not biological science to kick out evidence like the harrier picture, my legal argument is that it should be given less weight, less heft than the caracara picture and description as published in 1648. Especially thank you for this:</p><p>"Schneider (1786) had called Bloch's attention to the plates, who used them for a number of copper engravings of fishes. Schneider tried to identify 13 bird species, with minimal success. Then Illiger took notice of them but died before he could publish anything. Lichtenstein continued and identified many of the bird species." </p><p>But I believe that Illiger actually did publish something about the Dutch Brazil birds, in fact about the Caracara.</p><p>This is from Illiger's 1811 Prodromus systematis mammalium et avium:</p><p></p><p>Sunt rêvera duae Falconum species nondum descriptae e Brasilia allatae, tota rostji et pedum structura Gallinaceis, praesertim Penelopibus, ita similes, ut notis externis aegre ab iis distinguantur. Alus Falconibus Brasiliensibus tarsi admodum elongati sunt. </p><p></p><p>This is from page 234 of:</p><p><a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=hJY-AAAAcAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=Prodromus+systematis+mammalium+et+avium&cd=2#v=onepage&q=&f=false" target="_blank">http://books.google.com/books?id=hJY-AAAAcAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=Prodromus+systematis+mammalium+et+avium&cd=2#v=onepage&q=&f=false</a> </p><p>My Latin is slightly better than my German neither are good. But I think Illiger addresses the confusion between the Gallinacious like bird called Caracara Laurent thought was feral guinea fowls. Illiger also uses the word Brasiliensibus as had Marcgrave. I would be interested in a translation of this sentence.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mb1848, post: 1672769, member: 31036"] Rainier, thank you for all the information. This is a complex case. If it is not biological science to kick out evidence like the harrier picture, my legal argument is that it should be given less weight, less heft than the caracara picture and description as published in 1648. Especially thank you for this: "Schneider (1786) had called Bloch's attention to the plates, who used them for a number of copper engravings of fishes. Schneider tried to identify 13 bird species, with minimal success. Then Illiger took notice of them but died before he could publish anything. Lichtenstein continued and identified many of the bird species." But I believe that Illiger actually did publish something about the Dutch Brazil birds, in fact about the Caracara. This is from Illiger's 1811 Prodromus systematis mammalium et avium: Sunt rêvera duae Falconum species nondum descriptae e Brasilia allatae, tota rostji et pedum structura Gallinaceis, praesertim Penelopibus, ita similes, ut notis externis aegre ab iis distinguantur. Alus Falconibus Brasiliensibus tarsi admodum elongati sunt. This is from page 234 of: [url]http://books.google.com/books?id=hJY-AAAAcAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=Prodromus+systematis+mammalium+et+avium&cd=2#v=onepage&q=&f=false[/url] My Latin is slightly better than my German neither are good. But I think Illiger addresses the confusion between the Gallinacious like bird called Caracara Laurent thought was feral guinea fowls. Illiger also uses the word Brasiliensibus as had Marcgrave. I would be interested in a translation of this sentence. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Polyborus vs. Caracara
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top