What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Porro or Roof?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="denco@comcast.n" data-source="post: 3143793" data-attributes="member: 25300"><p>What is interesting about Amazon reviews is that some of the cheapest binoculars get the best star ratings. The reason is because like you say the people buying a Leupold Yosemite are usually people who have little or no experience with binoculars or they are simply cheapskates(HaHa). Just because a Yosemite has a 4.8 star rating and a Swarovski SV has a 4.8 star rating doesn't mean the Yosemite is as good as the Swaro. It means that for the PRICE paid the reviewer thinks it is a good VALUE. The people buying the Yosemite have probably never experienced an alpha binocular so they don't know any better. The same way with a man who has never experienced an alpha woman. They think their wife is just fine. The ratings are relative to the price of the item. There are greater expectations when you pay $2K for a binocular versus $100. Of course the ratings don't represent long term durability or manufacturers warranty or any of that stuff that really matters down the road either.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="denco@comcast.n, post: 3143793, member: 25300"] What is interesting about Amazon reviews is that some of the cheapest binoculars get the best star ratings. The reason is because like you say the people buying a Leupold Yosemite are usually people who have little or no experience with binoculars or they are simply cheapskates(HaHa). Just because a Yosemite has a 4.8 star rating and a Swarovski SV has a 4.8 star rating doesn't mean the Yosemite is as good as the Swaro. It means that for the PRICE paid the reviewer thinks it is a good VALUE. The people buying the Yosemite have probably never experienced an alpha binocular so they don't know any better. The same way with a man who has never experienced an alpha woman. They think their wife is just fine. The ratings are relative to the price of the item. There are greater expectations when you pay $2K for a binocular versus $100. Of course the ratings don't represent long term durability or manufacturers warranty or any of that stuff that really matters down the road either. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Porro or Roof?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top