What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Birds & Birding
Possible ABA area boundary change
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="njlarsen" data-source="post: 1574716" data-attributes="member: 7427"><p>As an outsider (European currently residing in the Caribbean), my perspective is that the area covered in field guides have changed in the last 20 years in Europe. It used to be strictly Europe that was covered, but as more people went for vacation in Southern Spain, Northern Africa, and the Middle East, there was an increase in the area covered. However, should in some future time the general crowd go a lot to say Gambia, I do not believe that would influence the field guides too much. There would just be too many new species to add that would only be relevant if birding S of Sahara. </p><p></p><p>Similarly, given the number of pages is Howell and Webb's Mexico guide, I don't think that an increased ABA region would lead to a field guide that included all in one. Maybe as a companion guide, and the Peterson has had a Mexico companion for a lot of years. </p><p></p><p>Niels</p><p></p><p>Maybe the period for Europe mentioned should have been 40 years or whatever -- anyway, that is not important for the point I am trying to make</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="njlarsen, post: 1574716, member: 7427"] As an outsider (European currently residing in the Caribbean), my perspective is that the area covered in field guides have changed in the last 20 years in Europe. It used to be strictly Europe that was covered, but as more people went for vacation in Southern Spain, Northern Africa, and the Middle East, there was an increase in the area covered. However, should in some future time the general crowd go a lot to say Gambia, I do not believe that would influence the field guides too much. There would just be too many new species to add that would only be relevant if birding S of Sahara. Similarly, given the number of pages is Howell and Webb's Mexico guide, I don't think that an increased ABA region would lead to a field guide that included all in one. Maybe as a companion guide, and the Peterson has had a Mexico companion for a lot of years. Niels Maybe the period for Europe mentioned should have been 40 years or whatever -- anyway, that is not important for the point I am trying to make [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Birds & Birding
Possible ABA area boundary change
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top