What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Others
Promaster Infinit Elite ELX ED 8x42
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Surveyor" data-source="post: 1289601" data-attributes="member: 50720"><p>Henry,</p><p> </p><p>Thanks for the input Henry. I found a couple of tricks while playing with the star test over the last couple of months. First the apparent filtering seems to work well and is just done by selecting different colored Christmas ornaments, I keep a green, red, blue, yellow and silver ball on the table, size 60mm. Also use two size ball bearings, 25 and 12 mm. I use a modified method of the glitter point by using an aperture along with it. I made up a spread sheet using Suitors math in the appendix of his book to adjust the aperture to whatever size I want and also lets me set two apertures a known distance apart for scaling purposes. I attached a jpg of the spread sheet set up for this test. I learned a lot from trying to photo this and have a few ideas I am going to try over the next couple of weeks.</p><p> </p><p>I too was surprised by the transmission curve but feel fairly confident, within the limitations of my very cheap equipment. You will notice that I showed two curves for one of the tubes. I was concerned about my setup and actually made 3 runs of the right tube. I completely redid the second run with the same parameters as the first, That did not make me feel any better so I tore the whole setup down and changed from a 10mm collimated beam to a 5 mm collimated beam and that is the result shown as #2 on the chart. I expected lower but using 0.7% loss and 8 elements would bring me down to 94.4% and measured about 91.?% (peak) average so that would leave about 3% in the prism, maybe a realistic possibility.</p><p> </p><p>Thanks again for your input.</p><p>Ron</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Surveyor, post: 1289601, member: 50720"] Henry, Thanks for the input Henry. I found a couple of tricks while playing with the star test over the last couple of months. First the apparent filtering seems to work well and is just done by selecting different colored Christmas ornaments, I keep a green, red, blue, yellow and silver ball on the table, size 60mm. Also use two size ball bearings, 25 and 12 mm. I use a modified method of the glitter point by using an aperture along with it. I made up a spread sheet using Suitors math in the appendix of his book to adjust the aperture to whatever size I want and also lets me set two apertures a known distance apart for scaling purposes. I attached a jpg of the spread sheet set up for this test. I learned a lot from trying to photo this and have a few ideas I am going to try over the next couple of weeks. I too was surprised by the transmission curve but feel fairly confident, within the limitations of my very cheap equipment. You will notice that I showed two curves for one of the tubes. I was concerned about my setup and actually made 3 runs of the right tube. I completely redid the second run with the same parameters as the first, That did not make me feel any better so I tore the whole setup down and changed from a 10mm collimated beam to a 5 mm collimated beam and that is the result shown as #2 on the chart. I expected lower but using 0.7% loss and 8 elements would bring me down to 94.4% and measured about 91.?% (peak) average so that would leave about 3% in the prism, maybe a realistic possibility. Thanks again for your input. Ron [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Others
Promaster Infinit Elite ELX ED 8x42
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top