Steve C
Well-known member
I have what is very likely the first of the ZEN ED 2 7x36 binoculars delivered to a customer. If memory serves that was 2009. I worked it over pretty hard when I got it. I dunked it in the water trough, hung it on the fence post overnight in nights with many degrees of frost. It rode in the saddle bag on the four wheeler out irrigating, checking cattle and sundry other farm duties. A summer in the four wheeler has destroyed other binoculars. One question is "what focus slop?". There is a minute amount that should not bother anyone, unless being picky is more second nature than it is to me. There is insignificant "slop" in my ZEN ED 2 10x43 as well as the 7x43 and in the 8x43 ED 3 I had. If you look hard enough there is some slop in anything. The ZEN ED focus slop is no different than in any I have had than with any other binocular in the general mid tier class. I say this not to be critical, but to state an observation of mine. Everyone should buy and use what they like. We like different things for different reasons. If focus is a big deal, get out the wallet. Tight and consistent tolerances and specifications don't come cheap.
While it is somewhat disconcerting to see some of the service complaints about ZR, their glass remains as good as anything else in that category. Yes there are better binoculars, there are sure worse. "Rough around the edges" is terminology that can be applied to anything regardless of cost simply because nothing is now, or ever will be perfect. So yes the ZEN ED series is rough around the edges, but something has to give to keep prices affordable (I sort of hate that word because it is sure different things to different people).
I have always looked at ZR as glass certainly good enough for use as a primary glass without breaking the budget. I have used several as primary binoculars and don't see where I missed anything. I formed a high opinion of their price vs quality performance. That opinion remains in place. For various reasons, not limited to my natural curiosity about optics, I have moved on, but still own some ZR binoculars.
My 7x36 has a place right beside the sliding glass door on the porch. The deck looks over a large rose hedge and a bunch of trees where it still gets frequent use, particularly during migrations. It remains as bright and tight as the day it came out of the box.
While it is somewhat disconcerting to see some of the service complaints about ZR, their glass remains as good as anything else in that category. Yes there are better binoculars, there are sure worse. "Rough around the edges" is terminology that can be applied to anything regardless of cost simply because nothing is now, or ever will be perfect. So yes the ZEN ED series is rough around the edges, but something has to give to keep prices affordable (I sort of hate that word because it is sure different things to different people).
I have always looked at ZR as glass certainly good enough for use as a primary glass without breaking the budget. I have used several as primary binoculars and don't see where I missed anything. I formed a high opinion of their price vs quality performance. That opinion remains in place. For various reasons, not limited to my natural curiosity about optics, I have moved on, but still own some ZR binoculars.
My 7x36 has a place right beside the sliding glass door on the porch. The deck looks over a large rose hedge and a bunch of trees where it still gets frequent use, particularly during migrations. It remains as bright and tight as the day it came out of the box.
Last edited: