What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
Quantitative image noise level measurements: Is the 50D really this bad?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Neil-T" data-source="post: 1543301" data-attributes="member: 68739"><p>50D Noise level on 800iso. Took a picture of a Bullfinch in the garden yesterday evening. The light was poor so I cranked the iso up to 800 and stopped down by one and a third to get a 125 shutter speed. I was in RAW/Large Jpeg so could compare the 2. The results were terrible and the noise very bad indeed. I was using my Bigma from only 6 feet away with zoom around 300/350 which would have been f/5.6ish. Will post a picture later if I remember. Neil.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Neil-T, post: 1543301, member: 68739"] 50D Noise level on 800iso. Took a picture of a Bullfinch in the garden yesterday evening. The light was poor so I cranked the iso up to 800 and stopped down by one and a third to get a 125 shutter speed. I was in RAW/Large Jpeg so could compare the 2. The results were terrible and the noise very bad indeed. I was using my Bigma from only 6 feet away with zoom around 300/350 which would have been f/5.6ish. Will post a picture later if I remember. Neil. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
Quantitative image noise level measurements: Is the 50D really this bad?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top