What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
Quantitative image noise level measurements: Is the 50D really this bad?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="stephenB" data-source="post: 1543714" data-attributes="member: 23668"><p>Thats pretty conclusive! I wonder if the difference between your images and my graphs can be due to your showing pictures at the same size, not on a constant pixel scale? If there are more pixels on the 50D images than for the 40D, then maybe there could be a certain amount of averaging going on either in the eye when viewing them, or in whatever has been used to scale them to the same size. This averaging will reduce apparent noise levels.</p><p></p><p>My noise analysis has of course been applied on 1:1 pixel level on all images. Also I dont have Lightroom, I just use PSE 6 and ACR. But surely that wouldnt make much difference?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="stephenB, post: 1543714, member: 23668"] Thats pretty conclusive! I wonder if the difference between your images and my graphs can be due to your showing pictures at the same size, not on a constant pixel scale? If there are more pixels on the 50D images than for the 40D, then maybe there could be a certain amount of averaging going on either in the eye when viewing them, or in whatever has been used to scale them to the same size. This averaging will reduce apparent noise levels. My noise analysis has of course been applied on 1:1 pixel level on all images. Also I dont have Lightroom, I just use PSE 6 and ACR. But surely that wouldnt make much difference? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
Quantitative image noise level measurements: Is the 50D really this bad?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top