What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Question about exit pupil and brightness
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="typo" data-source="post: 3430311" data-attributes="member: 83808"><p>Ed,</p><p></p><p>I think the interpretation might be rather more complex than that.</p><p></p><p>The way I read figures 5 and 6 in Holger's paper is that the detection benefit would only occur below 10cd/m2 for a 8x32 vs. 10x40 comparison. That's about the light level when most birders I know are heading home. </p><p></p><p>It shows that for most birding light levels, including a while after sunset, there generally would be no contrast enhancement and the only detail benefit would be the magnification advantage of a 10x over an 8x. Below that level, when the song birds are generally roosting, is when the increased contrast/ detection benefit can be seen, and below that still, the kind of detail increase described by the twilight factor. Of course the luminace, or brightness the eye sees is still identical for an 8x42 and 10x40. That would be in line with my own experience at least.</p><p></p><p>Not an easy message to convey, but the answer is for general birding there is no special benefit from higher magnification, but if you are going owling get a 10x56.</p><p></p><p>David</p><p></p><p>Responding to your added comment. These studies look at thresholds for angular size and contrast and generally point to a disproportional enhance performance for higher magnification at lower light levels. But you are right. Birding includes other parameters not considered. Never the less they paint a picture where there is a window of light levels where 'normal' rules apply and lower levels were higher magnifications appear to offer a disproportional advantage. I think it's clear tht colour discrimination will need something like ambient light colour temperature as an additional factor and detection, a different angular size range, to give a couple of examples. I haven't attempted to pin it down but in broad terms, I think 'normal' rules generally apply down to a bit past sunset. The difference between an 8x32 and 10x56 is a lot, in terms of usable light level but the amount of extra birding time is usually surprisingly modest.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="typo, post: 3430311, member: 83808"] Ed, I think the interpretation might be rather more complex than that. The way I read figures 5 and 6 in Holger's paper is that the detection benefit would only occur below 10cd/m2 for a 8x32 vs. 10x40 comparison. That's about the light level when most birders I know are heading home. It shows that for most birding light levels, including a while after sunset, there generally would be no contrast enhancement and the only detail benefit would be the magnification advantage of a 10x over an 8x. Below that level, when the song birds are generally roosting, is when the increased contrast/ detection benefit can be seen, and below that still, the kind of detail increase described by the twilight factor. Of course the luminace, or brightness the eye sees is still identical for an 8x42 and 10x40. That would be in line with my own experience at least. Not an easy message to convey, but the answer is for general birding there is no special benefit from higher magnification, but if you are going owling get a 10x56. David Responding to your added comment. These studies look at thresholds for angular size and contrast and generally point to a disproportional enhance performance for higher magnification at lower light levels. But you are right. Birding includes other parameters not considered. Never the less they paint a picture where there is a window of light levels where 'normal' rules apply and lower levels were higher magnifications appear to offer a disproportional advantage. I think it's clear tht colour discrimination will need something like ambient light colour temperature as an additional factor and detection, a different angular size range, to give a couple of examples. I haven't attempted to pin it down but in broad terms, I think 'normal' rules generally apply down to a bit past sunset. The difference between an 8x32 and 10x56 is a lot, in terms of usable light level but the amount of extra birding time is usually surprisingly modest. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Question about exit pupil and brightness
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top