What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Bird Identification Q&A
Raptor ID please.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Kerreran" data-source="post: 1792799" data-attributes="member: 56970"><p>The first photo was indeed very Gos-like, but there was always something 'off' with it - tail corners too sharp, and no neck being particular problems. I would have still said probably Gos but with reservations. The set of three show a clear Sprawk - and boy am I glad I got delayed before posting this! The second photo is most likely Sprawk as well - again the lack of a neck is a real anti-Gos feature. Tail corners could be sharp but the angle means you can't be sure.</p><p>Hip-heaviness at this time of year is unreliable, as they're all fluffing out their u/t coverts. Eye colour I just don't trust - too much variation and possibility of ambient light conditions affecting it. These photos clearly show Sprawks can show bulging secondaries [though not <em>that</em> bulging, it must be said]. If you see one well enough to judge the barring / hood then you won't need to, if you get my meaning.</p><p>Best bet is to wait for autumn and find an accipiter with streaking - definite Gos!</p><p><img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Kerreran, post: 1792799, member: 56970"] The first photo was indeed very Gos-like, but there was always something 'off' with it - tail corners too sharp, and no neck being particular problems. I would have still said probably Gos but with reservations. The set of three show a clear Sprawk - and boy am I glad I got delayed before posting this! The second photo is most likely Sprawk as well - again the lack of a neck is a real anti-Gos feature. Tail corners could be sharp but the angle means you can't be sure. Hip-heaviness at this time of year is unreliable, as they're all fluffing out their u/t coverts. Eye colour I just don't trust - too much variation and possibility of ambient light conditions affecting it. These photos clearly show Sprawks can show bulging secondaries [though not [I]that[/I] bulging, it must be said]. If you see one well enough to judge the barring / hood then you won't need to, if you get my meaning. Best bet is to wait for autumn and find an accipiter with streaking - definite Gos! ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Bird Identification Q&A
Raptor ID please.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top