What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Live Bird News from around the World
Rare Bird Found and Killed for “Research” ?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="chris butterworth" data-source="post: 3290130" data-attributes="member: 64315"><p>My last word as there is always going to be a yawning gulf between science and sentimentality. I'm not an "avian scientist" but I can give you the scientific answer. Beware though, it will release a torrent of smug, self satisfied answers from the more anti-science oriented members on here. The truthful answer to your question is "No". That is not to say that future methodologies and knowledge will not produce novel and important data from the speci men. One thing I can think of, off the top of my head is a far better understanding of the species diet. As the previous specimens are cabinet skins the probability that the intestinal tract, and it's contents, were disposed of on site means we only have a very vague understanding of any particular needs of the species. There are methodologies for "flushing out" living birds but, having seen it carried out on a Tristan Albatross, it's not something the anti's on here would be happy condoning.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="chris butterworth, post: 3290130, member: 64315"] My last word as there is always going to be a yawning gulf between science and sentimentality. I'm not an "avian scientist" but I can give you the scientific answer. Beware though, it will release a torrent of smug, self satisfied answers from the more anti-science oriented members on here. The truthful answer to your question is "No". That is not to say that future methodologies and knowledge will not produce novel and important data from the speci men. One thing I can think of, off the top of my head is a far better understanding of the species diet. As the previous specimens are cabinet skins the probability that the intestinal tract, and it's contents, were disposed of on site means we only have a very vague understanding of any particular needs of the species. There are methodologies for "flushing out" living birds but, having seen it carried out on a Tristan Albatross, it's not something the anti's on here would be happy condoning. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Live Bird News from around the World
Rare Bird Found and Killed for “Research” ?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top