What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Live Bird News from around the World
Rare Bird Found and Killed for “Research” ?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="John Cantelo" data-source="post: 3290230" data-attributes="member: 2844"><p>A number of comments questioning whether, in this instance, the killing a little known bird could be justified (either scientifically or otherwise) is scarcely a 'torrent'. Others can judge whether the comments questioning this here were smug and self satisfied, but I think these terms could better be applied to those who seem to think that the magic word "science" absolves them from criticism or the need to justify their actions to others, some of whom, shock, horror, may not be scientists themselves. To simply label those who question what happened as "anti-science" ducks the issue. Personally, I am willing to accept that there may be instances where collection of a specimens may be justified, but very strongly feel that this isn't one of them. The tissue thin justifications of what happened only tends to confirm my view.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="John Cantelo, post: 3290230, member: 2844"] A number of comments questioning whether, in this instance, the killing a little known bird could be justified (either scientifically or otherwise) is scarcely a 'torrent'. Others can judge whether the comments questioning this here were smug and self satisfied, but I think these terms could better be applied to those who seem to think that the magic word "science" absolves them from criticism or the need to justify their actions to others, some of whom, shock, horror, may not be scientists themselves. To simply label those who question what happened as "anti-science" ducks the issue. Personally, I am willing to accept that there may be instances where collection of a specimens may be justified, but very strongly feel that this isn't one of them. The tissue thin justifications of what happened only tends to confirm my view. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Live Bird News from around the World
Rare Bird Found and Killed for “Research” ?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top