What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Live Bird News from around the World
Rare Bird Found and Killed for “Research” ?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mitchelle" data-source="post: 3290374" data-attributes="member: 110086"><p>At this point, picking things up from the premise that what has been done has been done, and apparently no laws were broken, I would like Robert Moyle, Chris Filardi, Paul Sweet, and Tyrone Lavery to each explain what role they played in the decision, how the decision was made, and what is the expected potential resulting from the decision: the decision to kill the Moustashed Kingfisher.</p><p></p><p>It wouldn’t be a matter of questioning for judgmental purposes. Judgment has already been rendered: some condemn the decision, some support the decision. The questioning would be for the purpose of obtaining firsthand knowledge as to exactly why the decision was made.</p><p></p><p>Given an honest detailed explanation, whether liked or not, a figurative silent walkaway and polite closing of the door on them could then be appropriate.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mitchelle, post: 3290374, member: 110086"] At this point, picking things up from the premise that what has been done has been done, and apparently no laws were broken, I would like Robert Moyle, Chris Filardi, Paul Sweet, and Tyrone Lavery to each explain what role they played in the decision, how the decision was made, and what is the expected potential resulting from the decision: the decision to kill the Moustashed Kingfisher. It wouldn’t be a matter of questioning for judgmental purposes. Judgment has already been rendered: some condemn the decision, some support the decision. The questioning would be for the purpose of obtaining firsthand knowledge as to exactly why the decision was made. Given an honest detailed explanation, whether liked or not, a figurative silent walkaway and polite closing of the door on them could then be appropriate. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Live Bird News from around the World
Rare Bird Found and Killed for “Research” ?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top