What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
"Reach" 1D3 vs 30D vs 40D vs 50D
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="postcardcv" data-source="post: 1564618" data-attributes="member: 3294"><p>The 5D would make less sense than a 1D mkII, unless you are getting really close and can make full use of the full frame. Shamed as I am to admit it I have been through a fair few Canon DSLRs, while I have never owned the 5D I have owned the other cameras that you're talking about. The AF system on the 1D series is far superior to the xxD cameras, you would notice a real change. Of all the cameras that I've used the 1Ds mkII is far and away the best, the AF is lightening fast, the image quality is stunning and it's wonderful in the hand. My 1Ds mkII is my working camera (portraits and the like), and I've just bought a 50D to try for birding, but if I'd had the money I'd have gone for anothe 1Ds mkII.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="postcardcv, post: 1564618, member: 3294"] The 5D would make less sense than a 1D mkII, unless you are getting really close and can make full use of the full frame. Shamed as I am to admit it I have been through a fair few Canon DSLRs, while I have never owned the 5D I have owned the other cameras that you're talking about. The AF system on the 1D series is far superior to the xxD cameras, you would notice a real change. Of all the cameras that I've used the 1Ds mkII is far and away the best, the AF is lightening fast, the image quality is stunning and it's wonderful in the hand. My 1Ds mkII is my working camera (portraits and the like), and I've just bought a 50D to try for birding, but if I'd had the money I'd have gone for anothe 1Ds mkII. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
"Reach" 1D3 vs 30D vs 40D vs 50D
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top