What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
"Reach" 1D3 vs 30D vs 40D vs 50D
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tdodd" data-source="post: 1565269" data-attributes="member: 55450"><p>Look at the % figure as a <u>viewing magnification</u>, not as a proportion of the original that you cropped out.</p><p></p><p>To follow on from what Roy said, this forum allow .JPG attachments of up to 1024x800 pixels. Your 50D produces files of 4753x3168 pixels. If you wanted to display the whole image from your 50D you would have to resize it to fit into a 1024x800 maximum size. You'd have to resize it by a factor of 4752:1024 or about 4.6:1 or about 22%. So without cropping anything you'd be viewing at 22% magnification.</p><p></p><p>Now, lets say you crop your original a bit. To make the maths simple let's suppose you crop it to 4096x3200. To fit that into your 1024x800 "window" you'd need to view it at exactly 25% magnification. You now have a 25% crop.</p><p></p><p>If you cropped even tighter, to 2048x1600 you would have to view it at half size - 50% magnification in order to fit your image into the available space. You would have a 50% crop.</p><p></p><p>Finally, if you were to crop out just 1024x800 pixels from your original, you could display those pixels in that 1024x600 window with no resizing at all. You would be viewing pixels display at 1:1 ratio, or 100%.</p><p></p><p>You could crop smaller, if you wanted, to 800x533, for example, and that would fit into the 1024x800 "window" with room to spare. That would also be a 100% crop.</p><p></p><p>So the 100% refers to the viewing magnification, not the amount of image you cropped out. 100% crops are useful because they show you each and every pixel that the camera captured, and there are no odd artefcats of scaling/resizing, the success of which depends on the capabilities of the resizing software you use.</p><p></p><p>In DPP, in order to produce a 100% crop, all you need to do is crop a section of your image to 1024x800 or smaller and then output that cropped file without resizing.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tdodd, post: 1565269, member: 55450"] Look at the % figure as a [U]viewing magnification[/U], not as a proportion of the original that you cropped out. To follow on from what Roy said, this forum allow .JPG attachments of up to 1024x800 pixels. Your 50D produces files of 4753x3168 pixels. If you wanted to display the whole image from your 50D you would have to resize it to fit into a 1024x800 maximum size. You'd have to resize it by a factor of 4752:1024 or about 4.6:1 or about 22%. So without cropping anything you'd be viewing at 22% magnification. Now, lets say you crop your original a bit. To make the maths simple let's suppose you crop it to 4096x3200. To fit that into your 1024x800 "window" you'd need to view it at exactly 25% magnification. You now have a 25% crop. If you cropped even tighter, to 2048x1600 you would have to view it at half size - 50% magnification in order to fit your image into the available space. You would have a 50% crop. Finally, if you were to crop out just 1024x800 pixels from your original, you could display those pixels in that 1024x600 window with no resizing at all. You would be viewing pixels display at 1:1 ratio, or 100%. You could crop smaller, if you wanted, to 800x533, for example, and that would fit into the 1024x800 "window" with room to spare. That would also be a 100% crop. So the 100% refers to the viewing magnification, not the amount of image you cropped out. 100% crops are useful because they show you each and every pixel that the camera captured, and there are no odd artefcats of scaling/resizing, the success of which depends on the capabilities of the resizing software you use. In DPP, in order to produce a 100% crop, all you need to do is crop a section of your image to 1024x800 or smaller and then output that cropped file without resizing. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
"Reach" 1D3 vs 30D vs 40D vs 50D
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top