What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Bird Identification Q&A
Redpoll, South Wales
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Darryl" data-source="post: 1187494" data-attributes="member: 48633"><p><strong>Redpolls schmedpolls</strong></p><p></p><p>Afternoon Luke, afternoon Changer400,</p><p>First up, interesting bird, nice pics. I'm going to sound a note of caution here though, crack open your Svensson's and on page 299 you will find the following wisdom handed down by 'He who knows all': </p><p></p><p>"Plumage differences between ssp. <em>flammea</em>, <em>cabaret</em> and <em>rostrata</em> are generally rather slight and not always diagnostic when holding a single specimen in the hand. Therefore, structure and size always important for a reliable determination."</p><p></p><p>If you take comparable age/sex classes, on average <em>flammea</em> is roughly 5-10% larger/heavier than <em>cabaret</em>. The photos allow us to be pretty confident that the bird in question is an adult (i.e. 3rd cal. year or older) female and the bird sitting adjacent to it, in the third pic in post 17, is a 2nd cal. year female (nice comparison of TF shape in this pic). The age difference is unimportant at this stage (the 2nd cal. year bird is as big as it will get) so, as near as damn it, we are comparing like with like. As long as we are in agreement thus far (and as long as the third pic in post 17 gives a fair impression of the bird), I shouldn't be the only person thinking "it should be looking a bit bigger to be a classic <em>flammea</em>".</p><p></p><p>Plumage-wise it looks pretty good for <em>flammea</em>, structurally it looks like a <em>cabaret</em> (I don't see the 'bull-neck' or 'large bill' alluded to in post 4). </p><p></p><p>If this was in a mixed flock of <em>cabaret</em> and <em>flammea</em> on the east coast, I'm sure it would go on the <em>flammea</em> count but I'd want one that ticks all the boxes to be super-confident of slipping it past the WRP and onto the Gwent list. I would definitely submit it though, it is probably as good a candidate as we can hope for this 'winter' and I'm sure the WRP members love <em>flammea</em> records to adjudicate on <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p> </p><p>How did it look size-wise in the field? How many redpolls was it with? A lot of the redpolls round here are paired up now.</p><p></p><p>Cheers,</p><p>Darryl</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Darryl, post: 1187494, member: 48633"] [b]Redpolls schmedpolls[/b] Afternoon Luke, afternoon Changer400, First up, interesting bird, nice pics. I'm going to sound a note of caution here though, crack open your Svensson's and on page 299 you will find the following wisdom handed down by 'He who knows all': "Plumage differences between ssp. [I]flammea[/I], [I]cabaret[/I] and [I]rostrata[/I] are generally rather slight and not always diagnostic when holding a single specimen in the hand. Therefore, structure and size always important for a reliable determination." If you take comparable age/sex classes, on average [I]flammea[/I] is roughly 5-10% larger/heavier than [I]cabaret[/I]. The photos allow us to be pretty confident that the bird in question is an adult (i.e. 3rd cal. year or older) female and the bird sitting adjacent to it, in the third pic in post 17, is a 2nd cal. year female (nice comparison of TF shape in this pic). The age difference is unimportant at this stage (the 2nd cal. year bird is as big as it will get) so, as near as damn it, we are comparing like with like. As long as we are in agreement thus far (and as long as the third pic in post 17 gives a fair impression of the bird), I shouldn't be the only person thinking "it should be looking a bit bigger to be a classic [I]flammea[/I]". Plumage-wise it looks pretty good for [I]flammea[/I], structurally it looks like a [I]cabaret[/I] (I don't see the 'bull-neck' or 'large bill' alluded to in post 4). If this was in a mixed flock of [I]cabaret[/I] and [I]flammea[/I] on the east coast, I'm sure it would go on the [I]flammea[/I] count but I'd want one that ticks all the boxes to be super-confident of slipping it past the WRP and onto the Gwent list. I would definitely submit it though, it is probably as good a candidate as we can hope for this 'winter' and I'm sure the WRP members love [I]flammea[/I] records to adjudicate on :-) How did it look size-wise in the field? How many redpolls was it with? A lot of the redpolls round here are paired up now. Cheers, Darryl [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Bird Identification Q&A
Redpoll, South Wales
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top