What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Redpolls
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jalid" data-source="post: 2883124" data-attributes="member: 71011"><p>This is somewhat odd. Lijfeld and Bjerke published a description of what happened when flammea and cabaret bred in the same area. It is not their observations or results that can be contradicted, but their taxonomic significance. </p><p></p><p>Contra statement at page 713, interbreeding of flammea and cabaret has been recorded and published. But the single cases away from the core areas of both are not of great taxonomic importance. </p><p></p><p>In page 726, discussing about exilipes and flammea: "In reality, however, very small percentage is truly intermediate". It depends, of course. When the main migration of taiga breeding flammea goes past, there is no much intermediate looking birds (or Arctics). But when Arctic is more common, there really are lots of difficult-looking birds.</p><p></p><p>The Iceland situation is described much more thoroughly in this article than I remember reading before.</p><p></p><p>But "Further questions" are still essentially same than 10 years ago... or 20 years ago. Redpolls are nice birds but we are learning only slowly, when genetic studies have not helped us.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jalid, post: 2883124, member: 71011"] This is somewhat odd. Lijfeld and Bjerke published a description of what happened when flammea and cabaret bred in the same area. It is not their observations or results that can be contradicted, but their taxonomic significance. Contra statement at page 713, interbreeding of flammea and cabaret has been recorded and published. But the single cases away from the core areas of both are not of great taxonomic importance. In page 726, discussing about exilipes and flammea: "In reality, however, very small percentage is truly intermediate". It depends, of course. When the main migration of taiga breeding flammea goes past, there is no much intermediate looking birds (or Arctics). But when Arctic is more common, there really are lots of difficult-looking birds. The Iceland situation is described much more thoroughly in this article than I remember reading before. But "Further questions" are still essentially same than 10 years ago... or 20 years ago. Redpolls are nice birds but we are learning only slowly, when genetic studies have not helped us. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Redpolls
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top