What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Birds & Birding
Reputations
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pariah" data-source="post: 1498598" data-attributes="member: 23126"><p>Hi John,</p><p></p><p>Unfortunately the way the birding "system" is set up, unilaterally discriminates against those unwilling to work within it.</p><p></p><p>If, as you describe, an individual becomes "unreliable", whether thats imposed on him by a news service, rarities committee or just a group or an individual, then he is invariably put under increased pressure to prove his/her finds more conclusively than those throwing the mud. </p><p></p><p>This can go on for years. And when such an observer has enough and makes the decision to keep his finds to him/herself, then the majority of the community, which heretofore had stood by and allowed the situation to reach critical mass as it were, weighs in against said birder with gusto for supression...when all that birder wishes to do is walk away!</p><p></p><p>This is the unfortunate paradox of birding.</p><p></p><p>Over the past few years I have noticed the level of venom get worse and worse. Hoaxes, Mud slinging, Rumour and gossip mongering, eejits inventing usernames and email addresses to cause trouble from afar.</p><p></p><p>At some point we have to ask ourselves the question...Do we like were birding is going?</p><p></p><p>Owen</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pariah, post: 1498598, member: 23126"] Hi John, Unfortunately the way the birding "system" is set up, unilaterally discriminates against those unwilling to work within it. If, as you describe, an individual becomes "unreliable", whether thats imposed on him by a news service, rarities committee or just a group or an individual, then he is invariably put under increased pressure to prove his/her finds more conclusively than those throwing the mud. This can go on for years. And when such an observer has enough and makes the decision to keep his finds to him/herself, then the majority of the community, which heretofore had stood by and allowed the situation to reach critical mass as it were, weighs in against said birder with gusto for supression...when all that birder wishes to do is walk away! This is the unfortunate paradox of birding. Over the past few years I have noticed the level of venom get worse and worse. Hoaxes, Mud slinging, Rumour and gossip mongering, eejits inventing usernames and email addresses to cause trouble from afar. At some point we have to ask ourselves the question...Do we like were birding is going? Owen [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Birds & Birding
Reputations
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top