x32 binoculars are a particularly favorite format for me.
Interesting comparison pics, Steve.... looks like the Verano 32 has noticeably thicker armor (or thicker barrel walls?) and larger eye cups than the Traveler 32. And Opticron moved the focuser a bit farther from the eyepieces, which I think is a good move.
Taking your comparison of the Verano 32 to the Traveler 32, and then comparing my Traveler 32 to my UVHD+ 32 (8x and 10x versions are virtually identical in size)...
It appears that the Verano 32 also has noticeably thicker armor, and larger diameter & (possibly) deeper eyecups than the UVHD+ 32.
Verano 8x32 and UVHD+ 8x32 are virtually the same weight. Traveller 8x32 is about 2.7 oz. lighter.
If the Verano 8x32 can control glare nearly as well as the (much more expensive) Ultravid HD+, that would be quite an achievement. My only dislike of the otherwise quite enjoyable Traveller 8x32 is in glare control. UVHD+ 32 is my standard of comparison.
Interesting comparison pics, Steve.... looks like the Verano 32 has noticeably thicker armor (or thicker barrel walls?) and larger eye cups than the Traveler 32. And Opticron moved the focuser a bit farther from the eyepieces, which I think is a good move.
Taking your comparison of the Verano 32 to the Traveler 32, and then comparing my Traveler 32 to my UVHD+ 32 (8x and 10x versions are virtually identical in size)...

It appears that the Verano 32 also has noticeably thicker armor, and larger diameter & (possibly) deeper eyecups than the UVHD+ 32.
Verano 8x32 and UVHD+ 8x32 are virtually the same weight. Traveller 8x32 is about 2.7 oz. lighter.
If the Verano 8x32 can control glare nearly as well as the (much more expensive) Ultravid HD+, that would be quite an achievement. My only dislike of the otherwise quite enjoyable Traveller 8x32 is in glare control. UVHD+ 32 is my standard of comparison.
Last edited: