What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Reviews: premium 8x42s - Zeiss SF vs HT vs Leica Ultravid Plus vs Swarovision vs SLC
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="cnick6" data-source="post: 3282691" data-attributes="member: 127624"><p>Tobias,</p><p></p><p>Regarding your Leica UVHD+ 8x42 review, do you recall the conditions where you saw the CA? I just purchased mine back in early summer and haven't seen *ANY* CA at all. I'm not challenging your assertion but I am very curious to see if I can reproduce your red/green fringing. Do you specifically recall how you were testing for the CA? </p><p></p><p></p><p>Cheers,</p><p>-Nick</p><p></p><p>PS. Honest feedback: I thought your web site content was quite good but the design was too busy and hard to "read" the review titles. One quick suggestion would be to drop that secondary frame picture of the porro binoculars and just use a simple white background; otherwise, the page is very "busy" looking. Less is more in web design... <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="cnick6, post: 3282691, member: 127624"] Tobias, Regarding your Leica UVHD+ 8x42 review, do you recall the conditions where you saw the CA? I just purchased mine back in early summer and haven't seen *ANY* CA at all. I'm not challenging your assertion but I am very curious to see if I can reproduce your red/green fringing. Do you specifically recall how you were testing for the CA? Cheers, -Nick PS. Honest feedback: I thought your web site content was quite good but the design was too busy and hard to "read" the review titles. One quick suggestion would be to drop that secondary frame picture of the porro binoculars and just use a simple white background; otherwise, the page is very "busy" looking. Less is more in web design... :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Reviews: premium 8x42s - Zeiss SF vs HT vs Leica Ultravid Plus vs Swarovision vs SLC
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top