What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Reviews: premium 8x42s - Zeiss SF vs HT vs Leica Ultravid Plus vs Swarovision vs SLC
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="stephen b" data-source="post: 3283047" data-attributes="member: 80110"><p>FWIW:</p><p></p><p>Straight from Swarovski tech:</p><p></p><p>Came out and said they deliberately tried to reduce price to distance previous SLC HD from the SV. That was the purpose. They only changed ( besides the Armor) the close focus distance. Which he said is a significant reduction in build cost. Other than that optics are the same. He did not know anything about focus speed change. But with a change in close focus distance, that may have changed the focus speed a bit- even if not intentional.</p><p></p><p>Also said that in the center field that the optics of the SV and the SLC's ( both current and predecessor ) are basically the same. Only difference is field flatner. Went on to say that the SLC was probably best value that they make considering it has same optic glass as the SV- just no FF.</p><p></p><p>This is the same info told to me from a couple respected optic reps from Eagle Optics. Also correlates well with what most people that have seen these optics have noted.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="stephen b, post: 3283047, member: 80110"] FWIW: Straight from Swarovski tech: Came out and said they deliberately tried to reduce price to distance previous SLC HD from the SV. That was the purpose. They only changed ( besides the Armor) the close focus distance. Which he said is a significant reduction in build cost. Other than that optics are the same. He did not know anything about focus speed change. But with a change in close focus distance, that may have changed the focus speed a bit- even if not intentional. Also said that in the center field that the optics of the SV and the SLC's ( both current and predecessor ) are basically the same. Only difference is field flatner. Went on to say that the SLC was probably best value that they make considering it has same optic glass as the SV- just no FF. This is the same info told to me from a couple respected optic reps from Eagle Optics. Also correlates well with what most people that have seen these optics have noted. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Reviews: premium 8x42s - Zeiss SF vs HT vs Leica Ultravid Plus vs Swarovision vs SLC
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top