What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Robins are flycatchers?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Daniel Philippe" data-source="post: 1945889" data-attributes="member: 64614"><p>May be, but here is what Pierre-André Crochet (Birding World 17 (9): 354·355) writes after reading Zink et al. 2003:</p><p></p><p>"Nevertheless, two weakly supported clades separated the northern Eurasian samples from those of southern & central Eurasia. The northern clade included most samples of <em>svecica</em>, while the specimens of the other subspecies mostly fell in the southern clade, but there was still some mixture between these two clades. Some <em>svecica</em> specimens carrying lineages of the southern clade were found in central Asia, near the contact zone between both clades, but also well away from this contact area in Finland and northern Russia (north to Yamal). Several specimens carrying variants of the northern clade were also found in forms where mostly southern lineages were identified.</p><p>Thus, in Bluethroat, there is no strict association between geography and mitochondrial DNA, nor between subspecies and mitochondrial DNA. Furthermore, no subspecies or group of subspecies form strictly monophyletic units and there is no evidence of ancient divergence."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Daniel Philippe, post: 1945889, member: 64614"] May be, but here is what Pierre-André Crochet (Birding World 17 (9): 354·355) writes after reading Zink et al. 2003: "Nevertheless, two weakly supported clades separated the northern Eurasian samples from those of southern & central Eurasia. The northern clade included most samples of [I]svecica[/I], while the specimens of the other subspecies mostly fell in the southern clade, but there was still some mixture between these two clades. Some [I]svecica[/I] specimens carrying lineages of the southern clade were found in central Asia, near the contact zone between both clades, but also well away from this contact area in Finland and northern Russia (north to Yamal). Several specimens carrying variants of the northern clade were also found in forms where mostly southern lineages were identified. Thus, in Bluethroat, there is no strict association between geography and mitochondrial DNA, nor between subspecies and mitochondrial DNA. Furthermore, no subspecies or group of subspecies form strictly monophyletic units and there is no evidence of ancient divergence." [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Robins are flycatchers?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top