• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Where premium quality meets exceptional value. ZEISS Conquest HDX.

Ruddy Shelduck (1 Viewer)

Gander

Well-known member
I found two Ruddy Shelduck at one of my regular locations in Fife this morning. I am now trying to work out where this bird sits in terms of listing. It seems to be on the British list, but categorising it as BDE*F is as clear as mud. I have read some articles and posts on here that indicate that the birds are probably overshoots from a Dutch population. Quite understandable considering the strong southerlies we have been experiencing. Any thoughts?
 

Attachments

  • DSCN2057.jpg
    DSCN2057.jpg
    697.6 KB · Views: 9
  • DSCN2064.jpg
    DSCN2064.jpg
    669.1 KB · Views: 9
BDEF categorisation means this species is essentially untickable (if you follow BOU) However there’s a good chance this will change soon-ish. There is an ongoing review and birds from the large feral population in Central Europe could become acceptable as vagrants from an external established population, cat C5 I think?
Cheers
James
 
One has been photographed at the Montrose Basin recently, I have seen them fairly frequently over the past 15 years in and around Montrose area.
The only other one I have ever seen was at the Montrose Basin. Must have been about 5 years ago.
 
BDEF categorisation means this species is essentially untickable (if you follow BOU) However there’s a good chance this will change soon-ish. There is an ongoing review and birds from the large feral population in Central Europe could become acceptable as vagrants from an external established population, cat C5 I think?
Cheers
James
I was hopeful of that happening, as I think we all know that is what is the most likely source of these birds every year.

However, BOURC’s consideration of White-headed Duck has left me less optimistic. WHD was thought likely to have occurred naturally, but because no one individual was provable, they rejected the lot.

Sadly, I can’t see how the decision can be any different for Ruddy Shelduck.
 
I am not optimistic, and it is one of the reasons I don't really follow what the authorities say any more, its plainly ludicrous that Ruddy Shelduck isn't in category C5. They even created the category for such birds. BOU last had a wildfowl review a year or two ago, and I believe they do so every 4 years?

Whilst its plainly obvious that the influx of Ruddy Shelducks to the UK that occur virtually every year in summer/autumn correlates directly with their movement on the continent, apparently BOU think they must all be escapes. I have heard people say that it even makes a mockery of ability to adjudicate what is wild and what is not. Unfortunately, as I point out, they need to have a ringed individual to show that it comes from that population on the continent.

I understand the point, but in this case it is plainly ludicrous to the point of idiocy. Strangulated by their own bureaucracy.
 
There is no visible ring on the legs of the one photographed at Montrose Basin which was taken on the 10th of August.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top