Hi,
first of all, it would be interesting to know your age (or even better, your fully dark accommodated pupil size) so we can decide what exit pupil to aim for...
But as others have pointed out, chances are that your fully dark accommodated pupil size is larger than what the usual suspects in spotting scopes offer. If I knew a place to look for owls that could be reached w/o a lot of hiking, I would take an small or medium size astro ED refractor and the lowest mag EP that gives an exit pupil close to what my eye's pupils are at night. So either my ED 80 f7.5 with a 40mm EP resulting in 5.3mm exit pupil (exit pupil diameter = EP focal length / objective f focal ratio) resulting in a 15x magnification or the ED 120 f7.5 with the same 40mm EP and consequently the same 5.3mm exit pupil at 22.5x.
The ED 80 with rings and rail, a 2" diagonal and the quite heavy ES 40mm 68 deg EP will be about 5kg, the ED120 with the same diagonal and EP will be close to 10kg and has a length of more than 1m. Tripod and mount excluded - expect at least the weight of the optics for a suitable one.
An f6 scope would give 6.7mm exit pupil with the 40mm EP (which happens to have the largest field stop diameter possible with a 2" focus drive and thus the largest possible true field).
Also as Binastro has pointed out, these low magnifications will also be handled nicely by a good achromatic doublet objective - so if you want it just for owling, an f6 achro with the 40mm EP will be fine if you're still young or an f5 achro with a 30mm EP if 6mm exit pupil is all you need.
And no, spotting scopes rarely offer larger exit pupils than 3 or 4mm, the only exception that comes to mind would be the Celestron Hummingbird ED 9-27x56 with 6.2mm at the low mag end... but at that magnification you are probably getting better views with a pair of night bins (7x50, 8x56 or 10x60 - as the brain adds the images of both eyes you can actually see fainter objects in binoculars than in a monocular telescope of the same aperture).
Also I really wanted to go back to my scope and stuff and get my 5mm Nagler for some higher magnification views before I tested the Hummingbird at some telescope meeting, but after trying it with the stock zoom at 27x, I reconsidered - not worth the trouble as the image was not great beyond 20x or so. It might have been a dud, of course... or just physics telling the designer that an f3.5 ED doublet is not a good idea...
Joachim