What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Leica
ScopeViews reviews the 10x42 Noctivids
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="denco@comcast.n" data-source="post: 3664865" data-attributes="member: 25300"><p>Lee. I don't think it was just the apparent light weight of the SF's that Roger Vine had a problem with. He has had quality issues with several Zeiss samples. Here is a quote below from his review of the Zeiss 10x42 SF's. He actually preferred the SF over the SV though. I just bought a pair of Zeiss Victories 8x25 and although I had to return them for too much eye relief I was very disappointed in the build quality for an $800.00 pair of binoculars. In fact they looked like they were made in China.:king: I then bought a pair of Swarovski 8x25 CL-P's and honestly the quality was much higher. I had an older pair of Zeiss Victory's 8x20 a few years back that were much higher quality than the new model. Makes me think Zeiss quality is going down.</p><p></p><p>"Given that these SFs have among the best view and handling of any 42mm binoculars I’ve tested, you might imagine I’ll be rushing out to buy a pair. But I won’t be. And I’m not sure I’d recommend you to either. Why? In a word: quality.</p><p></p><p>You could dismiss the loose armour as a simple QA fail. But then there is all that dust in the left barrel. Even ignoring that, there is evidence of poor build-quality elsewhere: the loose eye cups, the uneven finish on the bridge, the loose and wobbly dioptre knob. Overall, these minor issues add up to a level of quality that just isn’t good enough in binoculars costing this much. I would put this down to a Friday afternoon example, but for the fact that several Zeiss binoculars I’ve reviewed recently have had less than perfect build-quality too.</p><p></p><p>I really loved using the Zeiss SFs. Based on their performance – view and handling – alone, these might well be the best binoculars I have ever reviewed. But their build quality just isn’t good enough and so I’d struggle to recommend them (at least based on this pair, anonymously bought new)."</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.scopeviews.co.uk/ZeissVictory10x42SF.htm" target="_blank">http://www.scopeviews.co.uk/ZeissVictory10x42SF.htm</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="denco@comcast.n, post: 3664865, member: 25300"] Lee. I don't think it was just the apparent light weight of the SF's that Roger Vine had a problem with. He has had quality issues with several Zeiss samples. Here is a quote below from his review of the Zeiss 10x42 SF's. He actually preferred the SF over the SV though. I just bought a pair of Zeiss Victories 8x25 and although I had to return them for too much eye relief I was very disappointed in the build quality for an $800.00 pair of binoculars. In fact they looked like they were made in China.:king: I then bought a pair of Swarovski 8x25 CL-P's and honestly the quality was much higher. I had an older pair of Zeiss Victory's 8x20 a few years back that were much higher quality than the new model. Makes me think Zeiss quality is going down. "Given that these SFs have among the best view and handling of any 42mm binoculars I’ve tested, you might imagine I’ll be rushing out to buy a pair. But I won’t be. And I’m not sure I’d recommend you to either. Why? In a word: quality. You could dismiss the loose armour as a simple QA fail. But then there is all that dust in the left barrel. Even ignoring that, there is evidence of poor build-quality elsewhere: the loose eye cups, the uneven finish on the bridge, the loose and wobbly dioptre knob. Overall, these minor issues add up to a level of quality that just isn’t good enough in binoculars costing this much. I would put this down to a Friday afternoon example, but for the fact that several Zeiss binoculars I’ve reviewed recently have had less than perfect build-quality too. I really loved using the Zeiss SFs. Based on their performance – view and handling – alone, these might well be the best binoculars I have ever reviewed. But their build quality just isn’t good enough and so I’d struggle to recommend them (at least based on this pair, anonymously bought new)." [url]http://www.scopeviews.co.uk/ZeissVictory10x42SF.htm[/url] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Leica
ScopeViews reviews the 10x42 Noctivids
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top