What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Leica
ScopeViews reviews the 10x42 Noctivids
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tenex" data-source="post: 3664890" data-attributes="member: 135233"><p>It's good to hear that Zeiss may have improved the quality of the recent/black SF model. But I think they're still neglecting the importance of first impressions in inspiring confidence. Being accustomed to a Leica now (though I do still have my old 15x60 GAT), I have to say that Zeiss binos today just tend to look a bit crude. Take something as simple as white lettering on a black ring below the ocular. When Leica does that it's elegant; on a Zeiss, whether a $2900 SF (which I've only seen photos of) or a Victory 8x25 (which I also had to return for defects, twice), it just <em>looks</em> cheap. The finish on the ring is too shiny, the paint too stark white, even the font too plain. And then there's the busy overdesign of the armor edges, etc. You start <em>looking</em> for something wrong. I don't mean to sound prissy here, but it's like putting a Kia grille on a BMW, which I'm sure the SF is, optically.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tenex, post: 3664890, member: 135233"] It's good to hear that Zeiss may have improved the quality of the recent/black SF model. But I think they're still neglecting the importance of first impressions in inspiring confidence. Being accustomed to a Leica now (though I do still have my old 15x60 GAT), I have to say that Zeiss binos today just tend to look a bit crude. Take something as simple as white lettering on a black ring below the ocular. When Leica does that it's elegant; on a Zeiss, whether a $2900 SF (which I've only seen photos of) or a Victory 8x25 (which I also had to return for defects, twice), it just [I]looks[/I] cheap. The finish on the ring is too shiny, the paint too stark white, even the font too plain. And then there's the busy overdesign of the armor edges, etc. You start [I]looking[/I] for something wrong. I don't mean to sound prissy here, but it's like putting a Kia grille on a BMW, which I'm sure the SF is, optically. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Leica
ScopeViews reviews the 10x42 Noctivids
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top