What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Leica
ScopeViews reviews the 10x42 Noctivids
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tobias Mennle" data-source="post: 3666641" data-attributes="member: 117315"><p>Henry, thanks a lot, more food for thought.</p><p></p><p>About moustache distortion, you´re of course right and I took similar notes when testing the 8x32 SV, it has pincushion in the center changing to, well, at least less pincushion towards the edge (whereas normally - so on Wikipedia - mustache distortion is defined as barrel in the center, pincushion at the edge.).</p><p></p><p>About veiling glare in the Noctivid, sorry I don´t have photos as I was using the little periods of sunshine to observe... but it´s really remarkable that annoying crescent flares were non existent. I will check when I get the 8x42.</p><p></p><p>So AMD basically means barrel distortion. </p><p></p><p>Still I am wondering if field curvature does give images extra 3dimensionality beyond pure stereopsis or sort of overlays the distortion pattern somehow. In classic pincushion designs like FL or Ultravid the image center sometimes seems to slightly bulge out a bit towards the viewer (like in barrel distortion) and when I put three wineglasses in a row and view them with one of these glasses they seem to get smaller towards the field edge. And what role does astigmatism play in that.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tobias Mennle, post: 3666641, member: 117315"] Henry, thanks a lot, more food for thought. About moustache distortion, you´re of course right and I took similar notes when testing the 8x32 SV, it has pincushion in the center changing to, well, at least less pincushion towards the edge (whereas normally - so on Wikipedia - mustache distortion is defined as barrel in the center, pincushion at the edge.). About veiling glare in the Noctivid, sorry I don´t have photos as I was using the little periods of sunshine to observe... but it´s really remarkable that annoying crescent flares were non existent. I will check when I get the 8x42. So AMD basically means barrel distortion. Still I am wondering if field curvature does give images extra 3dimensionality beyond pure stereopsis or sort of overlays the distortion pattern somehow. In classic pincushion designs like FL or Ultravid the image center sometimes seems to slightly bulge out a bit towards the viewer (like in barrel distortion) and when I put three wineglasses in a row and view them with one of these glasses they seem to get smaller towards the field edge. And what role does astigmatism play in that. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Leica
ScopeViews reviews the 10x42 Noctivids
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top