What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Leica
ScopeViews reviews the 10x42 Noctivids
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jack Speer" data-source="post: 3666653" data-attributes="member: 143695"><p>I am new to the technical side of things, but I don't think that's quite right. Henry or someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but angular magnification distortion is caused by the lack of pincushion distortion (though maybe it can be caused by barrel distortion as well?). By keeping the lines straight, AMD is introduced.</p><p></p><p>For me, looking through my Swarovision 8.5x42 it looks like objects brought to the top or bottom edge shrink relative to their normal size when seen through the center (for some odd reason I don't see this on the left or right, even when I look through one eye with the binocular turned sideways). This distortion is what causes rolling ball for some people. I think the only way to correct AMD is to introduce a certain amount of pincushion. Thus it is not possible to have a binocular free of both rectilinear distortion and AMD.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jack Speer, post: 3666653, member: 143695"] I am new to the technical side of things, but I don't think that's quite right. Henry or someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but angular magnification distortion is caused by the lack of pincushion distortion (though maybe it can be caused by barrel distortion as well?). By keeping the lines straight, AMD is introduced. For me, looking through my Swarovision 8.5x42 it looks like objects brought to the top or bottom edge shrink relative to their normal size when seen through the center (for some odd reason I don't see this on the left or right, even when I look through one eye with the binocular turned sideways). This distortion is what causes rolling ball for some people. I think the only way to correct AMD is to introduce a certain amount of pincushion. Thus it is not possible to have a binocular free of both rectilinear distortion and AMD. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Leica
ScopeViews reviews the 10x42 Noctivids
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top