What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Live Bird News from around the World
Sea Eagles in the frame as lamb devourers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="citrinella" data-source="post: 1297258" data-attributes="member: 15241"><p>This brings me back to the suggestion I have been making for supporting named species fledged on the land under management. I know this argument can sound complicated ! Caper summed up the attitude of the crofters neatly, but paying compensation for damage is not paying for the outcome we want. It leaves room for the compensation to be received (perhaps for falsified figures - dead lambs aren't hard to find, and cause of death may not be obvious); while at the same time raptors being persecuted - kept down to a minimum so that the compensation is paid.</p><p></p><p>What we need is a scheme that pays for what we want - actual diversity and abundance. In many cases monitoring of this is very good, and where that is the case we should at least pilot paying for fledged young. Yes, I know that they can be killed after fledging, but that reduces the number that would be available to produce fledged young and hence extra income next year. In the case of lambs, by fledging time the lambs are much bigger and not likely prey anyway. There will also come a point when extra fledged young will move away to try to establish breeding territories elsewhere anyway.</p><p></p><p>There have been loads of instances of interference by government in market forces. Experience should tell us that the ones that work best are those that reward for the ultimate objective. Those that reward for some proxy often achieve the proxy without actually achieving the real objective.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Sorry John, couldn't let this pass <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> I am a farmer, and I am not alone in being sickened by the situation regarding hen harriers in particular and many other raptors (including attitudes to sprawks by many peanut feeding ordinary people). Mind you, I am not a livestock farmer, but I do support thousands of tweets !</p><p></p><p>Mike.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="citrinella, post: 1297258, member: 15241"] This brings me back to the suggestion I have been making for supporting named species fledged on the land under management. I know this argument can sound complicated ! Caper summed up the attitude of the crofters neatly, but paying compensation for damage is not paying for the outcome we want. It leaves room for the compensation to be received (perhaps for falsified figures - dead lambs aren't hard to find, and cause of death may not be obvious); while at the same time raptors being persecuted - kept down to a minimum so that the compensation is paid. What we need is a scheme that pays for what we want - actual diversity and abundance. In many cases monitoring of this is very good, and where that is the case we should at least pilot paying for fledged young. Yes, I know that they can be killed after fledging, but that reduces the number that would be available to produce fledged young and hence extra income next year. In the case of lambs, by fledging time the lambs are much bigger and not likely prey anyway. There will also come a point when extra fledged young will move away to try to establish breeding territories elsewhere anyway. There have been loads of instances of interference by government in market forces. Experience should tell us that the ones that work best are those that reward for the ultimate objective. Those that reward for some proxy often achieve the proxy without actually achieving the real objective. Sorry John, couldn't let this pass :-) I am a farmer, and I am not alone in being sickened by the situation regarding hen harriers in particular and many other raptors (including attitudes to sprawks by many peanut feeding ordinary people). Mind you, I am not a livestock farmer, but I do support thousands of tweets ! Mike. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Live Bird News from around the World
Sea Eagles in the frame as lamb devourers
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top