• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Seagull at Cabo Raso (Atlantic coast of Portugal), 26/11/2022 (1 Viewer)

Good evening everyone,

On 26/11/2022 I photographed this seagull in Cabo Raso (Atlantic coast of Portugal) in flight to the North along the coast. Of a total of about 300 L. michahellis and L. fuscus that I counted in flight to the South during the morning, this was one of the rare gulls that flew to the North. I am not sure whether this bird is L. michahellis. Do you agree?

Thanks in advance.



  • IMG_3031.jpg
    111.7 KB · Views: 77
  • IMG_3032.jpg
    159.9 KB · Views: 84
  • IMG_3033.jpg
    167.5 KB · Views: 87
  • IMG_3038.jpg
    95.9 KB · Views: 81
hi Luis, quite an interesting bird, and certainly bears some potential for a 3rd cycle (3cy) Larus smithsonianus. Do you have more pics of it?
Hi Lou, thank you very much for your comments. I certainly wasn't expecting that species! I have 2 more photos, but I don't think they help much with identification. What do you think?

Thanks a lot!



  • IMG_3035.jpg
    114.3 KB · Views: 41
  • IMG_3036.jpg
    178.5 KB · Views: 41
Obvious contrast between the dark grey inner primaries and their white tips, as well as strong contrast between dark grey 'mantle' and white rump, so I would think it is one of those immature "lusitanius pitfalls", like this one that surely had me going:

I was hoping you to chime in, Peter, as I was aware of this pitfall 'lusie' - but the whole bird looks so immature that it seeems a bit hard to imagine even a very retarded YLG (although smudge around eye looks fine). Mantle looks pale to me but that could be an exposure thing.
Warning! This thread is more than 2 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread