What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Bird Identification Q&A
Semi-collared Flycatcher in Finland?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JANJ" data-source="post: 1466564" data-attributes="member: 20722"><p>As mentioned earlier - the middle tertial pattern might seem out of line for a female SCF and indeed many have a thinner white edge. On the other hand, Krister Mild shows in his Birding World article, that some can have a rather broad edge near the base of the middle tertial and even on the longest tertial. These individuals would make a fairly good match to both PF & CF. Regarding the width of the white tips on the greater coverts, it seems to ba a fairly variable feature on SCF, making the finnish bird not an exceptional one refering to this feature alone. Some SCF caught in Israel in spring shows variable broadness to tips of greater coverts and some have a slight variable middle tertial pattern with slightly broader edge near the base. However, it should be noted that the white base to secondaries might merge together with the tips of greater coverts on the closed wing, making greater covert tips look broader than they really are:</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.tarsiger.com/gallery/index.php?pic_id=muu1203454396&lang=eng" target="_blank">http://www.tarsiger.com/gallery/index.php?pic_id=muu1203454396&lang=eng</a></p><p></p><p>However, it should be pointed out that identification of females of all three species can be extremely difficult and it could well be that the subject bird is only some variant of either PF or CF (or SCF<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" />) for that matter.</p><p></p><p>Wonder what KM would have to say about this one?</p><p></p><p>JanJ</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JANJ, post: 1466564, member: 20722"] As mentioned earlier - the middle tertial pattern might seem out of line for a female SCF and indeed many have a thinner white edge. On the other hand, Krister Mild shows in his Birding World article, that some can have a rather broad edge near the base of the middle tertial and even on the longest tertial. These individuals would make a fairly good match to both PF & CF. Regarding the width of the white tips on the greater coverts, it seems to ba a fairly variable feature on SCF, making the finnish bird not an exceptional one refering to this feature alone. Some SCF caught in Israel in spring shows variable broadness to tips of greater coverts and some have a slight variable middle tertial pattern with slightly broader edge near the base. However, it should be noted that the white base to secondaries might merge together with the tips of greater coverts on the closed wing, making greater covert tips look broader than they really are: [url]http://www.tarsiger.com/gallery/index.php?pic_id=muu1203454396&lang=eng[/url] However, it should be pointed out that identification of females of all three species can be extremely difficult and it could well be that the subject bird is only some variant of either PF or CF (or SCF;)) for that matter. Wonder what KM would have to say about this one? JanJ [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Bird Identification Q&A
Semi-collared Flycatcher in Finland?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top