What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Sharpness and resolution, one subject or two ?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="elkcub" data-source="post: 3173125" data-attributes="member: 14473"><p>Hi Kimmo,</p><p></p><p>In reviewing who said what on this thread, I came to realize that you had already provided this excellent "elaboration," that's very much worth rereading. :t:</p><p></p><p>My earlier comments were basically intended to point out that Suiter's book primarily addresses the evaluation and correction of astronomical telescopes, and that his approach is to pictorially show idealized individual aberration effects using MTF graphs and star pattern images. The computer programs and graphics needed to do this were truly formidable. (Appendix B, for those with courage.) </p><p></p><p>Later in the book he does refer to the eye end eyepiece, even for astro. telescope evaluation (Chap. 12, Pg. 232, below). But, in the end the star tester is faced with evaluating the aggregate pattern, which is a complicated mix of interactive effects (Chapter 15, Pg. 265, below). </p><p></p><p>That's were human pattern recognition/interpretation enters the picture. :eek!:</p><p></p><p>Ed</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="elkcub, post: 3173125, member: 14473"] Hi Kimmo, In reviewing who said what on this thread, I came to realize that you had already provided this excellent "elaboration," that's very much worth rereading. :t: My earlier comments were basically intended to point out that Suiter's book primarily addresses the evaluation and correction of astronomical telescopes, and that his approach is to pictorially show idealized individual aberration effects using MTF graphs and star pattern images. The computer programs and graphics needed to do this were truly formidable. (Appendix B, for those with courage.) Later in the book he does refer to the eye end eyepiece, even for astro. telescope evaluation (Chap. 12, Pg. 232, below). But, in the end the star tester is faced with evaluating the aggregate pattern, which is a complicated mix of interactive effects (Chapter 15, Pg. 265, below). That's were human pattern recognition/interpretation enters the picture. :eek!: Ed [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Sharpness and resolution, one subject or two ?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top