.... Furthermore, binoculars with higher magnifications (reduced depth of field) and a high ratio of the focusing drive ("fast focus") need to be adjusted more carefully than others. This is obviously popularly understood as "snapping" the focus ...
Certainly slow adjustment, at just the right stage, does help the 'snapping' to take place, while this probably improves with practice. However I am not so sure that careful adjustment is really what is popularly understood as "'snapping' the focus".
Instead, statements included phrases like '(binocular xxx) shows good focus snap'. It used to mentioned much more regularly and still seems to be a very useful, perhaps essential, feature.
As as above I understand that it is the function of the operator's brain and eye which probably produce the seemingly independent and automatic effect. i.e. the focus seems to 'focus snap'
by itself, like magic, rather than it being 'snapped'
consciously and intentionally by the operator, in the process of careful adjustment.
The point was intended to be that a binocular which is capable of sharper focus would be more likely to, and more readily, exhibit the phenomenon of Focus Snap.
That begs the question as to whether, when adjustment in the right direction approaches the eye's accommodating range, a binocular would be equally likely to, or most readily, do the trick:-
A. when
most of the field were about to become sharp (flatter field?)
or
B. only a
small sweet spot were about to become sharp
I think not, and A. would be the favourite, but at the moment I don't have binoculars with a small sweet spot to try it.