What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Bird Identification Q&A
Shorebird ID, Pennsylvania, USA
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="John o'Sullivan" data-source="post: 1200209" data-attributes="member: 6170"><p>I know from personal and annecdotal experience that Little stints (as a peep example) can change shape, size and colouration quite dramatically depending on weather conditions and how sleek/fluffed up they are "holding" their feathers. </p><p></p><p>A few times at Goldcliff (Wales) birds have been initialy I.D. on Jizz (viewing conditions are often straight into the sun) as Bairds due to them appearing bigger, longer winged, more attenuated etc than little stint typically appear. The birds then adjust their position and they become bog standard little stints.</p><p></p><p>At least twice this has happened with extended views by experienced observers of birds on which plumage details cannot be seen (even though the birds are relatively close). </p><p></p><p>It would appear that the same has happened with the sandpipers above.</p><p></p><p>Luckily with the birds above plumage details can be seen and therefore despite the apparent size illusion both in photos and real life the agreement is the birds have to be Least sand.</p><p></p><p>The photos might also reflect a difference in appearence due to posture <strong>and</strong> size illusion as a photographic artifact.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="John o'Sullivan, post: 1200209, member: 6170"] I know from personal and annecdotal experience that Little stints (as a peep example) can change shape, size and colouration quite dramatically depending on weather conditions and how sleek/fluffed up they are "holding" their feathers. A few times at Goldcliff (Wales) birds have been initialy I.D. on Jizz (viewing conditions are often straight into the sun) as Bairds due to them appearing bigger, longer winged, more attenuated etc than little stint typically appear. The birds then adjust their position and they become bog standard little stints. At least twice this has happened with extended views by experienced observers of birds on which plumage details cannot be seen (even though the birds are relatively close). It would appear that the same has happened with the sandpipers above. Luckily with the birds above plumage details can be seen and therefore despite the apparent size illusion both in photos and real life the agreement is the birds have to be Least sand. The photos might also reflect a difference in appearence due to posture [B]and[/B] size illusion as a photographic artifact. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Bird Identification Q&A
Shorebird ID, Pennsylvania, USA
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top